Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-07
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Subharmonic quartic and harmonic saddle

Example

For n≥2, on B‾1(0) the function q(x)=∣x∣4 is subharmonic and lies below the harmonic function h≡1 having the same boundary values. The function s(x)=x12−x22 is harmonic and has a saddle at the origin, despite ∇s(0)=0.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The objects and hypotheses in the example.

[F1]

Subharmonicity in the classical convention is nonnegativity of the Laplacian. (Subharmonic and superharmonic functions in rn).

[F2]

On bounded nonempty open sets, the classical Laplacian and boundary comparisons imply comparison on the closure. (Comparison principle for classical subharmonic functions).

[F3]

The strong harmonic theorem requires an attained interior global maximum or minimum on a domain. (Strong maximum principle for harmonic functions).

Verification

technique · direct
1.1F1givenalgebra

Differentiation gives ∂iq=4∣x∣2xi and ∂iiq=8xi2+4∣x∣2, so Δq=4(n+2)∣x∣2≥0. It is subharmonic, with value one on the unit sphere.

2.1F2step 1.1

The constant h=1 is harmonic, and Δq≥Δh with equal boundary values. Comparison gives q≤h on the closed ball, also directly visible from ∣x∣≤1.

3.1F3algebra∎

For s, the only nonzero pure second derivatives are ∂11s=2 and ∂22s=−2, so Δs=0 and ∇s(0)=0. But s(te1)=t2 and s(te2)=−t2 for 0<∣t∣<1, proving that zero is neither a local maximum nor a local minimum. There is no interior global extremum to which the strong theorem would apply.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

10 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources