How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Hopf conclusion needs a strict nonconstant extremum
Statement refuted
For , a boundary maximum and an interior sphere alone do not force a strictly positive outward derivative. On , the harmonic function attains its maximum at every boundary point and has outward derivative zero there.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The objects and hypotheses in the statement refuted.
Hopf assumes a strict interior inequality below the boundary maximum as well as an interior tangent ball and the specified continuity and derivative conditions. (Hopf boundary point lemma for the laplacian).
Counterexample
The function is smooth with zero Laplacian and zero boundary values. At each , the ball itself is an interior tangent ball and its outward direction is .
For , , so the outward derivative is zero. The strict condition inside the domain, required by Hopf, fails; all its other stated conditions are satisfied.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
6 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Gantumur, Harmonic functions (standard reference, not scraped)