How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Weak maximum principle needs boundedness or control at infinity
Statement refuted
Without boundedness or control at infinity, a harmonic function continuous on the closure of an open set and zero on its nonempty boundary need not be nonpositive inside. For , take and .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The objects and hypotheses in the statement refuted.
The weak maximum principle assumes a bounded nonempty open set and a subharmonic function continuous on the closure. (Weak maximum principle for the laplacian).
Counterexample
The half-space is open, connected and unbounded, with nonempty boundary . The affine function is smooth on all of , has Laplacian zero, and vanishes on that boundary.
For every , , and these values tend to infinity as . Hence the proposed interior bound fails. The bounded-open-set hypothesis of the weak maximum principle does not hold for this example.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
4 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Thomas Schmidt, Lectures Notes, PDE (standard reference, not scraped)