Alphabeta Math
CounterexampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passaudited 2026-08-13
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Uncorrelated finite random variables need not be independent

Statement refuted

If Cov(X,Y)=0, then the finite random variables X and Y are independent.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The uniform space Ω={1,0,1}, the identity variable X(ω)=ω, and Y=X2.

[L1]

Uniform probabilities are cardinality ratios (The uniform probability space on a nonempty finite set).

[L2]

Independence requires every joint attained-value probability to factor (Pairwise and mutual independence of finite-valued random variables).

Counterexample

technique · constructive
1.1

On the stated three-point space, symmetry gives E[X]=0 and E[XY]=E[X3]=0, while E[Y]=2/3.

givenL1algebraconstruct
1.2

But P(X=0,Y=0)=1/3, whereas P(X=0)P(Y=0)=(1/3)(1/3)=1/9.

L1algebra
2.1

Hence Cov(X,Y)=0.

step 1.1L3algebra
3.1

Thus X,Y are uncorrelated but not independent.

step 2.1step 1.2L2discharge-construct

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · next 3 levels

Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 36 results over 12 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.

Sources