How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
For dependent variables, need not equal
Statement refuted
Every pair of finite random variables satisfies .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A uniform random sign on and the variable .
A uniform two-point space gives both outcomes probability (The uniform probability space on a nonempty finite set).
Independence requires joint attained-value probabilities to factor (Pairwise and mutual independence of finite-valued random variables).
Expectation is the weighted finite sum of values (Expectation of a real random variable on a finite probability space).
Counterexample
For the constructed pair , directly , while everywhere and hence .
Also , so the variables are dependent.
Thus , refuting the statement.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 32 results over 13 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- J. Matousek and J. Vondrak, The Probabilistic Method, Section 1.1 (standard reference, not scraped)