How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
False: linearity of expectation requires independence
Statement
The identity is valid only when and are independent.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Finite real random variables on one finite probability space.
Expectation is linear for every finite family of random variables, without any independence hypothesis (Expectation is linear for every finite family of random variables, without any independence hypothesis).
A uniform two-point space assigns each outcome probability (The uniform probability space on a nonempty finite set).
Independence requires every joint attained-value probability to factor (Pairwise and mutual independence of finite-valued random variables).
Refutation
On the uniform random-sign space, take and . Then , so [L3] shows that and are dependent.
Nevertheless [L1] gives . Therefore independence is not necessary for linearity, so the statement is false.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 40 results over 14 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- C. M. Grinstead and J. L. Snell, Introduction to Probability, 2nd ed., Theorem 6.2 (standard reference, not scraped)