How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
is differentiable everywhere but not absolutely continuous
Statement refuted
Every everywhere-differentiable function on is absolutely continuous.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: and for .
Counterexample
The difference quotient at is , which tends to ; for , . Thus is differentiable everywhere.
Put . Then , and the finite partitions containing have variation at least . This diverges as , so is not of bounded variation.
Every absolutely continuous function has bounded variation by implies Lipschitz, Lipschitz implies absolutely continuous, and absolutely continuous implies continuous and bounded variation. Therefore is not absolutely continuous.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
19 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Donald L. Cohn, Measure Theory, 2nd ed., §6.3, Exercise 6 (standard reference, not scraped)