Alphabeta Math
Pipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

6 results · all verified · 6 also independently AI-judged
Every result on this page is machine-checked by a proof checker and read in full and owner-audited; the judge is an additional, independent cross-model AI review of the proofs; all 6 also cleared it.

Absolute Continuity and the Sharp Fundamental Theorem of Calculus: Examples

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Summary

The examples separate the sharp theorem from tempting weaker hypotheses: an everywhere differentiable function can fail AC, property (N) alone is not enough, and composition needs its stated extra hypotheses.

3 · Logical flowchart

4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs

None yet.

5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements

CounterexampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-06Open item page →

x2sin(1/x2) is differentiable everywhere but not absolutely continuous

Statement refuted

Every everywhere-differentiable function on [0,1] is absolutely continuous.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: F(0)=0 and F(x)=x2sin(1/x2) for 0<x1.

Counterexample

technique · direct
1.1

The difference quotient at 0 is xsin(1/x2), which tends to 0; for x>0, F(x)=2xsin(1/x2)2cos(1/x2)/x. Thus F is differentiable everywhere.

givenalgebra
2.1

Put xn=(π/2+nπ)1/2. Then F(xn)=(1)nxn2, and the finite partitions containing xN<xN1<<x0 have variation at least n<N(xn2+xn+12). This diverges as N, so F is not of bounded variation.

step 1.1algebra
3.1

Every absolutely continuous function has bounded variation by C1 implies Lipschitz, Lipschitz implies absolutely continuous, and absolutely continuous implies continuous and bounded variation. Therefore F is not absolutely continuous.

step 2.1
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-06Open item page →

Integration by parts for absolutely continuous functions

Example

Assume the Axioms of Countable Choice and Dependent Choice. On [0,1], take F(x)=x and G(x)=x. Both are absolutely continuous, and integration by parts gives 01xdx+01x2xdx=1.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Countable choice, dependent choice, F(x)=x, and G(x)=x on [0,1].

Verification

technique · direct
1.1

F(x)=0x(2t)1dt and G(x)=0x1dt. Both integrands are in L1[0,1], so The indefinite integral of an L1 function is absolutely continuous makes F and G AC; their derivatives are respectively (2x)1 and 1 almost everywhere.

givenalgebra
2.1

Apply Integration by parts for absolutely continuous functions: its endpoint term is F(1)G(1)F(0)G(0)=1.

step 1.1
3.1

The two integrands are respectively x and x/2, whose integrals are 2/3 and 1/3.

step 2.1algebra
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-06Open item page →

Change of variables through an increasing AC map with a positive-measure flat set

Example

Assume the Axioms of Countable Choice and Dependent Choice. Let E[0,1] be a fat Cantor set with λ(E)=1/2, put g(x)=0x1[0,1]E(t)dt, and take f(y)=2y. Then g is increasing AC, g=0 almost everywhere on the positive-measure set E, and 01/22ydy=012g(x)g(x)dx=1/4.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Countable choice, dependent choice, the displayed measurable set E, its integral function g, and f(y)=2y.

Verification

technique · direct
1.1

The integrand 1[0,1]E lies in L1[0,1]. Thus The indefinite integral of an L1 function is absolutely continuous makes g AC, and The indefinite integral of an L1 function is differentiable almost everywhere gives g=1[0,1]E a.e.; hence g=0 on E a.e. and g(1)=1/2.

given
2.1step 1.1
3.1

Its formula gives the displayed equality, while direct integration gives its common value 1/4.

step 2.1algebra
CounterexampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-06Open item page →

The Cantor function fails Luzin's property (N)

Statement refuted

Every continuous function of bounded variation has Luzin's property (N).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Countable choice and the standard Cantor--Lebesgue function C:[0,1][0,1].

Counterexample

technique · direct
1.1

C is continuous, nondecreasing, and maps the ternary Cantor set K onto [0,1].

given
2.1

The set K has Lebesgue measure zero, but λ(C(K))=1.

step 1.1
3.1

Thus C fails (N) as defined in Luzin's property (N) on a compact interval; Banach--Zarecki confirms it cannot be AC.

step 2.1
CounterexampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-06Open item page →

A classical composition of absolutely continuous functions is not absolutely continuous

Statement refuted

The composition of two absolutely continuous functions must be absolutely continuous.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: g(0)=0, g(x)=x2sin2(1/x) for x>0, and h(y)=y on [0,1].

Counterexample

technique · direct
1.1

g is bounded on (0,1] and g(0)=0, so g is Lipschitz and AC; h=1/(2y) lies in L1[0,1], so h is AC.

givenalgebra
2.1

(hg)(x)=xsin(1/x) for x>0. On alternating half-waves its total variation has a positive contribution comparable to 1/n; the harmonic sum diverges.

step 1.1algebra
3.1

Thus the composite is not BV and hence not AC, proving the general failure announced in The composition of two absolutely continuous functions need not be absolutely continuous.

step 2.1
CounterexampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-06Open item page →

Luzin's property (N) does not imply absolute continuity

Statement refuted

Luzin's property (N) implies absolute continuity.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Countable choice, F(0)=0, and F(x)=xsin(1/x) for 0<x1.

Counterexample

technique · direct
1.1

On each [1/(n+1),1/n], F is C1, hence maps null sets to null sets. Together with the singleton {0} this countable cover proves that F has (N) in the sense of Luzin's property (N) on a compact interval.

given
2.1

F(x)=sin(1/x)cos(1/x)/x for x>0; alternating subintervals again give infinite variation. Thus F is not BV.

step 1.1algebra
3.1

The reverse implication in Banach--Zarecki characterisation of absolute continuity requires BV, so this (N) function is not AC.

step 2.1

Sources