Alphabeta Math
Pipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

✓ 6 results · all verified · 6 also independently AI-judged
Every result on this page is machine-checked by a proof checker and read in full and owner-audited; the judge is an additional, independent cross-model AI review of the proofs; all 6 also cleared it.

Absolute Continuity and the Sharp Fundamental Theorem of Calculus: Examples

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Summary

The examples separate the sharp theorem from tempting weaker hypotheses: an everywhere differentiable function can fail AC, property (N) alone is not enough, and composition needs its stated extra hypotheses.

3 · Logical flowchart

4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs

None yet.

5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements

CounterexampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-06Open item page →

x2sin⁡(1/x2) is differentiable everywhere but not absolutely continuous

Statement refuted

Every everywhere-differentiable function on [0,1] is absolutely continuous.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: F(0)=0 and F(x)=x2sin⁡(1/x2) for 0<x≤1.

Counterexample

technique · direct
1.1givenalgebra

The difference quotient at 0 is xsin⁡(1/x2), which tends to 0; for x>0, F′(x)=2xsin⁡(1/x2)−2cos⁡(1/x2)/x. Thus F is differentiable everywhere.

2.1step 1.1algebra

Put xn=(π/2+nπ)−1/2. Then F(xn)=(−1)nxn2, and the finite partitions containing xN<xN−1<⋯<x0 have variation at least ∑n<N(xn2+xn+12). This diverges as N→∞, so F is not of bounded variation.

3.1step 2.1∎

Every absolutely continuous function has bounded variation by C1 implies Lipschitz, Lipschitz implies absolutely continuous, and absolutely continuous implies continuous and bounded variation. Therefore F is not absolutely continuous.

ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-06Open item page →

Integration by parts for absolutely continuous functions

Example

Assume the Axioms of Countable Choice and Dependent Choice. On [0,1], take F(x)=x and G(x)=x. Both are absolutely continuous, and integration by parts gives ∫01x dx+∫01x2x dx=1.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Countable choice, dependent choice, F(x)=x, and G(x)=x on [0,1].

Verification

technique · direct
1.1givenalgebra

F(x)=∫0x(2t)−1 dt and G(x)=∫0x1 dt. Both integrands are in L1[0,1], so The indefinite integral of an L1 function is absolutely continuous makes F and G AC; their derivatives are respectively (2x)−1 and 1 almost everywhere.

2.1step 1.1

Apply Integration by parts for absolutely continuous functions: its endpoint term is F(1)G(1)−F(0)G(0)=1.

3.1step 2.1algebra∎

The two integrands are respectively x and x/2, whose integrals are 2/3 and 1/3.

ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-06Open item page →

Change of variables through an increasing AC map with a positive-measure flat set

Example

Assume the Axioms of Countable Choice and Dependent Choice. Let E⊂[0,1] be a fat Cantor set with λ(E)=1/2, put g(x)=∫0x1[0,1]∖E(t)dt, and take f(y)=2y. Then g is increasing AC, g′=0 almost everywhere on the positive-measure set E, and ∫01/22y dy=∫012g(x)g′(x) dx=1/4.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Countable choice, dependent choice, the displayed measurable set E, its integral function g, and f(y)=2y.

Verification

technique · direct
1.1given

The integrand 1[0,1]∖E lies in L1[0,1]. Thus The indefinite integral of an L1 function is absolutely continuous makes g AC, and The indefinite integral of an L1 function is differentiable almost everywhere gives g′=1[0,1]∖E a.e.; hence g′=0 on E a.e. and g(1)=1/2.

2.1step 1.1
3.1step 2.1algebra∎

Its formula gives the displayed equality, while direct integration gives its common value 1/4.

CounterexampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-06Open item page →

The Cantor function fails Luzin's property (N)

Statement refuted

Every continuous function of bounded variation has Luzin's property (N).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Countable choice and the standard Cantor--Lebesgue function C:[0,1]→[0,1].

Counterexample

technique · direct
1.1given

C is continuous, nondecreasing, and maps the ternary Cantor set K onto [0,1].

2.1step 1.1

The set K has Lebesgue measure zero, but λ(C(K))=1.

3.1step 2.1∎

Thus C fails (N) as defined in Luzin's property (N) on a compact interval; Banach--Zarecki confirms it cannot be AC.

CounterexampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-06Open item page →

A classical composition of absolutely continuous functions is not absolutely continuous

Statement refuted

The composition of two absolutely continuous functions must be absolutely continuous.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: g(0)=0, g(x)=x2sin⁡2(1/x) for x>0, and h(y)=y on [0,1].

Counterexample

technique · direct
1.1givenalgebra

g′ is bounded on (0,1] and g′(0)=0, so g is Lipschitz and AC; h′=1/(2y) lies in L1[0,1], so h is AC.

2.1step 1.1algebra

(h∘g)(x)=∣xsin⁡(1/x)∣ for x>0. On alternating half-waves its total variation has a positive contribution comparable to 1/n; the harmonic sum diverges.

3.1step 2.1∎

Thus the composite is not BV and hence not AC, proving the general failure announced in The composition of two absolutely continuous functions need not be absolutely continuous.

CounterexampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-06Open item page →

Luzin's property (N) does not imply absolute continuity

Statement refuted

Luzin's property (N) implies absolute continuity.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Countable choice, F(0)=0, and F(x)=xsin⁡(1/x) for 0<x≤1.

Counterexample

technique · direct
1.1given

On each [1/(n+1),1/n], F is C1, hence maps null sets to null sets. Together with the singleton {0} this countable cover proves that F has (N) in the sense of Luzin's property (N) on a compact interval.

2.1step 1.1algebra

F′(x)=sin⁡(1/x)−cos⁡(1/x)/x for x>0; alternating subintervals again give infinite variation. Thus F is not BV.

3.1step 2.1∎

The reverse implication in Banach--Zarecki characterisation of absolute continuity requires BV, so this (N) function is not AC.

Sources