How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Luzin's property on a compact interval
Definition
For and , say that has Luzin's property if, for every , implies , where is Lebesgue outer measure (Lebesgue outer measure on ). This formulation is meaningful before any measurability of has been proved. It is an image condition; it asserts nothing about preimages of null sets. On it holds automatically.
Depends on
Used by
- Luzin's property (N) does not imply absolute continuity Counterexample
- The Cantor function fails Luzin's property (N) Counterexample
- Luzin's property (N) implies absolute continuity False statement
- Luzin's property (N) gives an integral growth estimate Lemma
- Absolutely continuous functions have Luzin's property (N) Theorem
- Banach--Zarecki characterisation of absolute continuity Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
5 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Christopher Heil, Absolute Continuity and the Banach--Zaretsky Theorem, §3.4 (standard reference, not scraped)