How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Luzin's property implies absolute continuity
Statement
A function with Luzin's property is absolutely continuous.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Define and for .
Refutation
The function is on every interval , hence Lipschitz there. These intervals and the singleton form a countable cover, so maps every null set to a null set and has property as in Luzin's property on a compact interval.
Since for , alternating subintervals give infinite variation. Thus is not BV.
Every absolutely continuous function on a compact interval is BV by implies Lipschitz, Lipschitz implies absolutely continuous, and absolutely continuous implies continuous and bounded variation. Hence this property- function is not AC.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
14 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Christopher Heil, Absolute Continuity and the Banach--Zaretsky Theorem, §3.4 (standard reference, not scraped)