How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The Cantor function fails Luzin's property
Statement refuted
Every continuous function of bounded variation has Luzin's property .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Countable choice and the standard Cantor--Lebesgue function .
Counterexample
is continuous, nondecreasing, and maps the ternary Cantor set onto .
The set has Lebesgue measure zero, but .
Thus fails as defined in Luzin's property on a compact interval; Banach--Zarecki confirms it cannot be AC.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
16 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Donald L. Cohn, Measure Theory, 2nd ed., §6.3, Exercise 5 (standard reference, not scraped)