Alphabeta Math
CounterexampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-06
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The Cantor function fails Luzin's property (N)

Statement refuted

Every continuous function of bounded variation has Luzin's property (N).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Countable choice and the standard Cantor--Lebesgue function C:[0,1][0,1].

Counterexample

technique · direct
1.1

C is continuous, nondecreasing, and maps the ternary Cantor set K onto [0,1].

given
2.1

The set K has Lebesgue measure zero, but λ(C(K))=1.

step 1.1
3.1

Thus C fails (N) as defined in Luzin's property (N) on a compact interval; Banach--Zarecki confirms it cannot be AC.

step 2.1

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

16 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources