How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A contractible complex is acyclic
Statement
Every contractible chain complex is acyclic.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A contractible chain complex .
A contractible complex is chain homotopy equivalent to the zero complex (A contractible complex).
A chain homotopy equivalence is a quasi-isomorphism (A chain homotopy equivalence is a quasi-isomorphism).
Proof
By [L1], the unique map is a chain homotopy equivalence.
Then [L2] makes a quasi-isomorphism. Since the zero complex has zero homology in every degree, for all , so is acyclic.
Depends on
Used by
- An acyclic noncontractible complex from a nonsplit extension Counterexample
- FALSE: every acyclic complex is contractible False statement
- Zero homology does not make an object zero in the homotopy category Proposition
Dependency tree · two levels
7 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Charles A. Weibel, Chapter 1 of An Introduction to Homological Algebra (standard reference, not scraped)
- Joseph J. Rotman, An Introduction to Homological Algebra, 2nd ed. (standard reference, not scraped)