How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A finite p-group has only the trivial simple module over a field of characteristic p
Statement
Let be a finite -group and a splitting field of characteristic . Then the only simple -module is the trivial module .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A finite -group and a splitting field of characteristic .
The group algebra is local (For a finite group and a field of characteristic p, the group algebra is local exactly when the group is a p-group).
Proof
By [L1], the algebra has a unique simple module up to isomorphism.
The augmentation map makes the ground field into a simple -module on which every element of acts trivially. Since step 1.1 says there is only one simple module, it must be this trivial module.
Depends on
Used by
- Brauer characters of a p-group Example
- Defect zero and p group boundaries Example
Dependency tree · two levels
8 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Peter Webb, A Course in Finite Group Representation Theory (23 Feb 2016 draft) (standard reference, not scraped)