Alphabeta Math
CorollaryStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passaudited 2026-08-16
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A Galois connection between posets satisfies FGF=F and GFG=G

Statement

Let A,B be posets and let F:AB, G:BA form a Galois connection. Then

FGF=F,GFG=G.

For preorders, the same argument gives pointwise equivalences FGFF and GFGG in the associated thin categories, but equality need not follow without antisymmetry.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Posets A,B and a Galois connection FG.

[L1]

A Galois connection satisfies aGF(a) and FG(b)b, and both maps are monotone (Galois connection between preorders).

[F1]

Antisymmetry says that xy and yx imply x=y (Partial order and partially ordered set).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Applying F to aGF(a) gives F(a)FGF(a), while the counit inequality at F(a) gives FGF(a)F(a).

L1
1.2

Applying G to FG(b)b gives GFG(b)G(b), while the unit inequality at G(b) gives G(b)GFG(b).

L1
2.1

Antisymmetry applied to steps 1.1 and 1.2 gives FGF(a)=F(a) and GFG(b)=G(b) for every a,b, hence the two equalities of maps.

step 1.1step 1.2F1
3.1

Without antisymmetry, steps 1.1 and 1.2 still give morphisms in both directions between the corresponding objects of each thin category, which are inverse because parallel morphisms are unique.

step 1.1step 1.2

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · next 3 levels

Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 5 results over 4 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.

Sources