How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A Galois connection between posets satisfies and
Statement
Let be posets and let , form a Galois connection. Then
For preorders, the same argument gives pointwise equivalences and in the associated thin categories, but equality need not follow without antisymmetry.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Posets and a Galois connection .
A Galois connection satisfies and , and both maps are monotone (Galois connection between preorders).
Antisymmetry says that and imply (Partial order and partially ordered set).
Proof
Applying to gives , while the counit inequality at gives .
Applying to gives , while the unit inequality at gives .
Antisymmetry applied to steps 1.1 and 1.2 gives and for every , hence the two equalities of maps.
Without antisymmetry, steps 1.1 and 1.2 still give morphisms in both directions between the corresponding objects of each thin category, which are inverse because parallel morphisms are unique.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 5 results over 4 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Emily Riehl, Category Theory in Context, 2nd ed., Corollary 4.2.10 (standard reference, not scraped)