How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
In a poset adjunction the triangle identities are automatic
Statement
Let and be monotone maps between posets. If there are natural transformations and , equivalently the pointwise inequalities
then both triangle identities hold automatically. In particular, the unit and counit inequalities of a Galois connection determine an adjunction without a separate triangle calculation.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The monotone maps and pointwise inequalities in the Statement.
A preorder determines a category with at most one morphism between any two objects, and functors between such categories are exactly monotone maps (A preorder is a category with at most one morphism between any two objects, and its functors are exactly monotone maps).
A Galois connection supplies the unit inequalities and counit inequalities (Galois connection between preorders).
Proof
By [F1], each pointwise inequality is the unique possible morphism with its source and target, so the supplied families are natural transformations.
At , the two sides of the first triangle identity are parallel morphisms in the thin category , hence they are equal.
At , the two sides of the second triangle identity are parallel morphisms in the thin category , hence they are equal.
Thus both triangle identities hold. Applying this to the inequalities in [L1] proves the final assertion.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 7 results over 4 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Tom Leinster, Basic Category Theory, Example 2.2.7 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Emily Riehl, Category Theory in Context, 2nd ed., Section 4.2 (standard reference, not scraped)