Alphabeta Math
CorollaryStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-29
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A nonreal eigenvector yields an invariant real two-plane and the standard rotation-scaling block

Statement

Let T:V→V be an endomorphism of a real vector space, identify V with the fixed real form of the canonical conjugation on VC, and suppose w=u+iv with u,v∈V is an eigenvector of TC with eigenvalue λ=a+bi, where b≠0. Then u and v are R-linearly independent, span⁡R{u,v} is T-invariant, and with respect to the ordered basis (u,−v) the matrix of T restricted to that plane is

(a−bba).

Moreover σ(w)=u−iv is an eigenvector of TC with eigenvalue λ‾=a−bi.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A real vector space V, an endomorphism T, and an eigenvector w=u+iv of TC with eigenvalue λ=a+bi, where u,v∈V and b≠0.

[L1]

Every element of VC is uniquely u+iv with u,v in the fixed real form V (The fixed points of a conjugation form a real vector space whose complexification recovers the ambient complex space).

[L2]

The canonical conjugation interchanges the generalised eigenspaces of λ and λ‾ (For a real operator, nonreal generalised eigenspaces of the complexification occur in conjugate pairs).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1L1givenalgebra

By [L1], the decomposition w=u+iv with u,v∈V is unique. Both u and v are nonzero: if v=0 then w lies in V and TCw=λw forces b=0; symmetrically u=0 would give the same contradiction for the coefficient of i.

2.1step 1.1algebra

Expanding TC(u+iv)=λ(u+iv) gives Tu+iTv=(au−bv)+i(bu+av); comparing the V- and iV-components, which are unique by [L1], yields Tu=au−bv and Tv=bu+av.

2.2step 1.1L2

The conjugate vector is an eigenvector for λ‾: σ(w)=u−iv lies in Gλ‾(1)(TC) by [L2] applied with e=1.

3.1step 1.1step 2.1L1algebra

The vectors u,v are R-linearly independent: if u and v were dependent, then, since both are nonzero, v=αu for a real α, so w=(1+iα)u and dividing the eigen-equation by 1+iα≠0 gives TCu=λu. But TCu=Tu lies in V, while λu=au+biu has nonzero i-component bu, contradicting uniqueness of the components in [L1].

3.2step 2.1algebra

The plane is invariant and the block appears: Tu=au−bv=au+b(−v) and T(−v)=−(bu+av)=−bu+a(−v) by step 2.1, so in the ordered basis (u,−v) the two columns are (ab) and (−ba).

4.1step 2.2step 3.1step 3.2∎

Steps 3.1 and 3.2 prove the independence, invariance and matrix claims, and step 2.2 the conjugate eigenvector claim.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

12 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources