How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
For a real operator, nonreal generalised eigenspaces of the complexification occur in conjugate pairs
Statement
Let be an endomorphism of a real vector space, let be the canonical conjugation of , and let and . Then
Thus for nonreal the generalised eigenspaces of for and for are interchanged by the real-linear involution , and they have the same real dimension.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A real vector space , an endomorphism , a complex scalar , and an exponent .
A conjugation is conjugate-linear and an involution (Conjugations and real structures on a complex vector space).
The complexification of a real operator commutes with the canonical conjugation, because it comes from a real operator (A complex-linear operator comes from a real operator exactly when it commutes with the chosen conjugation).
The generalised eigenspace of exponent is (Primary components and generalised eigenspaces ).
Proof
The operator commutes with by [L2], and is an -linear involution, hence a bijection, with by [L1].
The powers commute with up to conjugation of the scalar: for , by step 1.1 and [L1]; iterating this times gives .
If , then , so by [L3].
Conversely, if , then satisfies , so ; since is an involution, the two inclusions combine to the equality .
Because is real-linear and bijective by step 1.1, the two generalised eigenspaces have the same real dimension; for nonreal they form the conjugate pair interchanged by .
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
14 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Keith Conrad, Complexification (notes) (standard reference, not scraped)