How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A reflective subcategory of a complete category is complete
Statement
If is a reflective full subcategory of a complete category , then is complete: every small diagram in has a limit.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A reflective full inclusion and a complete category .
A reflective inclusion creates every ambient limit in the ordinary isomorphism-invariant sense (A reflective inclusion creates every ambient limit in the ordinary isomorphism-invariant sense).
A category is complete when every small diagram in it has a limit, including the empty diagram (Finite, small, and large limits and colimits; complete and cocomplete categories).
Proof
Let be any small diagram in . Completeness of gives a limit of .
By [L1], the inclusion creates from that ambient limit a limit of in . This applies to every small , including the empty diagram, so [L2] proves that is complete.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 26 results over 9 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- E. Riehl, Category Theory in Context, corollary 4.5.15 (standard reference, not scraped)