Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passjudge pass (deepseek-v4-pro + gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-08-16
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A reflective inclusion creates every ambient limit in the ordinary isomorphism-invariant sense

Statement

Let I:AC be the inclusion of a reflective full subcategory. For every indexing category J, every diagram D:JA, and every limiting cone (L,pj) of ID in C, that cone is isomorphic to the image of a limiting cone of D in A. Moreover, every cone of D whose image is limiting is itself limiting. Thus I creates all limits in the ordinary isomorphism-invariant sense of Preservation, reflection, and creation of limits and colimits; continuous and cocontinuous functors.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A reflection RI (Reflective full subcategory and reflector), a diagram D:JA, and a limiting cone (L,pj) of ID in C.

[L1]

An ambient object lies in the essential image of I exactly when its reflection unit is invertible (An ambient object lies in the essential image of a reflective inclusion exactly when its reflection unit is invertible).

[L2]

Right adjoints preserve every existing limit over legitimate indexing categories (Right adjoints preserve every limit that exists).

[L3]

Ordinary creation requires an ambient limiting cone to be isomorphic to the image of a limiting source cone, and requires every source cone with limiting image to be limiting (Preservation, reflection, and creation of limits and colimits; continuous and cocontinuous functors).

[L4]

A limiting cone has a unique mediating morphism from every cone with the same base diagram (Limits and colimits as terminal cones and initial cocones, with existence and uniqueness in their universal properties).

[L5]

For a full subcategory, a supplied reflector with its adjunction is equivalently a specified universal arrow (RC,ηC) from each object C to the inclusion, the specified arrows being the components of the reflection unit (A full subcategory is reflectively structured exactly when universal arrows are supplied at every ambient object).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Applying R to the legs and then the counit gives a cone from R(L) to D; after inclusion its legs are I(εDj)IR(pj). Naturality of the unit and the triangle identity give I(εDj)IR(pj)ηL=pj, so ηL is a morphism from the given cone to this included cone.

givenL4
2.1

By the universal property in [L4], the included cone has a unique map q:IR(L)L with pjq=I(εDj)IR(pj). Cone uniqueness gives qηL=1L. Both 1IR(L) and ηLq are maps between reflected objects whose composites with the universal reflection arrow ηL equal ηL, and by [L5] the unit component ηL is a universal arrow from L to I, so the uniqueness clause of that universal property makes ηLq=1IR(L). Hence ηL is invertible and [L1] identifies L with an included object.

step 1.1L1L4L5
3.1

Transporting the limiting cone across this isomorphism produces a cone of D in the full subcategory whose image is isomorphic to (L,pj). Its image is limiting, and since I is a right adjoint, [L2] preserves every source limit; conversely fullness makes any mediating map between included objects a unique map in A, so a source cone with limiting image is limiting. These are exactly the clauses of [L3], including the empty and degenerate indexing categories.

step 2.1L2L3L4

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · next 3 levels

Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 31 results over 13 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.

Sources