How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A reflective inclusion creates every ambient limit in the ordinary isomorphism-invariant sense
Statement
Let be the inclusion of a reflective full subcategory. For every indexing category , every diagram , and every limiting cone of in , that cone is isomorphic to the image of a limiting cone of in . Moreover, every cone of whose image is limiting is itself limiting. Thus creates all limits in the ordinary isomorphism-invariant sense of Preservation, reflection, and creation of limits and colimits; continuous and cocontinuous functors.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A reflection (Reflective full subcategory and reflector), a diagram , and a limiting cone of in .
An ambient object lies in the essential image of exactly when its reflection unit is invertible (An ambient object lies in the essential image of a reflective inclusion exactly when its reflection unit is invertible).
Right adjoints preserve every existing limit over legitimate indexing categories (Right adjoints preserve every limit that exists).
Ordinary creation requires an ambient limiting cone to be isomorphic to the image of a limiting source cone, and requires every source cone with limiting image to be limiting (Preservation, reflection, and creation of limits and colimits; continuous and cocontinuous functors).
A limiting cone has a unique mediating morphism from every cone with the same base diagram (Limits and colimits as terminal cones and initial cocones, with existence and uniqueness in their universal properties).
For a full subcategory, a supplied reflector with its adjunction is equivalently a specified universal arrow from each object to the inclusion, the specified arrows being the components of the reflection unit (A full subcategory is reflectively structured exactly when universal arrows are supplied at every ambient object).
Proof
Applying to the legs and then the counit gives a cone from to ; after inclusion its legs are . Naturality of the unit and the triangle identity give , so is a morphism from the given cone to this included cone.
By the universal property in [L4], the included cone has a unique map with . Cone uniqueness gives . Both and are maps between reflected objects whose composites with the universal reflection arrow equal , and by [L5] the unit component is a universal arrow from to , so the uniqueness clause of that universal property makes . Hence is invertible and [L1] identifies with an included object.
Transporting the limiting cone across this isomorphism produces a cone of in the full subcategory whose image is isomorphic to . Its image is limiting, and since is a right adjoint, [L2] preserves every source limit; conversely fullness makes any mediating map between included objects a unique map in , so a source cone with limiting image is limiting. These are exactly the clauses of [L3], including the empty and degenerate indexing categories.
Depends on
- Reflective full subcategory and reflector
- An ambient object lies in the essential image of a reflective inclusion exactly when its reflection unit is invertible
- Right adjoints preserve every limit that exists
- Preservation, reflection, and creation of limits and colimits; continuous and cocontinuous functors
- Limits and colimits as terminal cones and initial cocones, with existence and uniqueness in their universal properties
- A full subcategory is reflectively structured exactly when universal arrows are supplied at every ambient object
Used by
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 31 results over 13 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- E. Riehl, Category Theory in Context, corollary 4.5.15 (standard reference, not scraped)