How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The absolute line integral of the constant function 1 is the length of the path
Statement
For every rectifiable contour ,
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A rectifiable contour .
The absolute line integral is (The absolute line integral over a rectifiable path using its arc-length function).
The arc-length function satisfies and (The arc-length function of a rectifiable path).
Proof
With , [L1] becomes .
Substitute [L2] to obtain . Singleton and constant paths have both sides .
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 25 results over 10 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- L. Ahlfors, Complex Analysis, 3rd ed., Ch. 4 (standard reference, not scraped)