How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
FALSE: the modulus of a contour integral always equals the absolute line integral
Statement
False claim. For every continuous and rectifiable contour ,
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The constant function on a positively oriented circle of radius .
A constant contour integral is the constant times the endpoint displacement (The contour integral of a constant c is c times the endpoint displacement).
The absolute integral of is the contour length (The absolute line integral of the constant function 1 is the length of the path).
The correct general relation is the fundamental inequality (The fundamental inequality: the modulus of the integral is at most the absolute line integral for rectifiable contours).
Refutation
Since the circle is closed, [L1] gives .
By [L2], its absolute integral is its positive length .
Thus equality fails: . The values still satisfy the inequality in [L3].
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 34 results over 9 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Lars Ahlfors, Complex Analysis, third edition, Ch. 4 §1.2 (standard reference, not scraped)