How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Additive categories are closed under passage to the opposite
Statement
If is additive, then is additive.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: An additive category .
The opposite of a preadditive category is preadditive (The opposite of a preadditive category is preadditive).
An additive category is a preadditive category with finite biproducts (Additive category).
Proof
By [L2], is preadditive, so is preadditive by [L1].
By [L2], has finite biproducts. Passing to the opposite category swaps products and coproducts, so every finite biproduct diagram in becomes a diagram in that is again simultaneously a finite product and a finite coproduct. Thus has finite biproducts.
Thus is preadditive and has finite biproducts, so it is additive by [L2].
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
7 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- The Stacks Project, Section 12.3: Preadditive and additive categories (standard reference, not scraped)