How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Associated primes of a cyclic quotient are colon primes
Statement
Let be a commutative ring and let be an ideal. Then
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A commutative ring and an ideal .
A prime ideal belongs to exactly when it is the annihilator of some element of (Associated primes of a module).
The quotient module consists of the cosets (Quotient module with scalar multiplication on additive cosets).
The annihilator of an element is the set of scalars that kill (Annihilators, torsion elements and the torsion subset of a module).
Proof
For any , the annihilator of in is
If , then [L1] gives a nonzero class with . Since , one has , and step 1.1 yields .
Conversely, if for some and if is prime, then step 1.1 gives with , so by [L1].
Steps 2.1 and 2.2 prove the stated description of .
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
9 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- J. S. Milne, A Primer of Commutative Algebra, v4.03, §19 (standard reference, not scraped)
- The Stacks Project, Section 10.63: Associated primes (standard reference, not scraped)