How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Borel sets are exactly analytic and coanalytic sets
Statement
In ZFC, a subset of a Polish space is Borel if and only if it is analytic and coanalytic.
Facts & Assumptions
Analytic countable operations and inclusion of Borel sets makes every Borel set analytic and coanalytic.
Borel separation of disjoint analytic sets separates disjoint analytic sets by a Borel set.
Assume The Axiom of Choice.
Proof
Given: A subset of Polish , under ZFC.
If is Borel, F1, whose ZFC hypothesis is supplied by A1, says exactly that and its complement are analytic. This is analyticity and coanalyticity.
Conversely if is analytic and coanalytic, both and are analytic, and they are disjoint. By F2 and A1 take Borel with and . The second relation gives , so is Borel. This includes and by the same inclusions. QED.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
11 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Corollary 4.14, printed p37 (standard reference, not scraped)