How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A closed convex set is an intersection of closed half-spaces
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice. Every nonempty closed convex is the intersection of the closed affine half-spaces that contain .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The Axiom of Choice and a nonempty closed convex set .
Disjoint convex sets with one open are strictly separated by a nonzero continuous functional (Separation of disjoint convex sets when one is open).
Proof
Since every closed affine half-space in the family contains , their intersection contains .
If , choose with . The set is open and convex and still omits ; [F1], using AC through its open-convex point-separation supplier, gives a nonzero continuous with for every and .
Taking the supremum over in step 1.2 gives for every . Since , the closed half-space contains and excludes . Thus every exterior point is excluded from the intersection, proving equality.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
9 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Theo Buehler and Dietmar Salamon, Functional Analysis, Exercise 2.51 (standard reference, not scraped)