CorollaryStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-14

How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Cohomology operations are universal classes on Eilenberg--Mac Lane spaces

Statement

Assume AC. Let $A, B$ be abelian groups, let $n \geq 1$ , and let $r \in Z$ . Natural cohomology operations on based CW complexes whose basepoint is a vertex

$Θ : {\tilde{H}}^{n} (-; A) ⟶ {\tilde{H}}^{n + r} (-; B)$

are in bijection with universal classes

$u \in {\tilde{H}}^{n + r} (K (A, n); B) .$

The class belonging to $Θ$ is $u = Θ_{K (A, n)} (ι_{n})$ , and the operation belonging to $u$ is pullback of $u$ along a classifying map. No additivity is assumed. For connected CW complexes with both source and target degrees positive, this is equivalently the ordinary-cohomology statement.

For a family $(Θ_{n})_{n \geq 1}$ , commutation with reduced cohomology suspension at every positive source degree is exactly compatibility of its universal classes with cohomology suspension: if $s_{n} : Σ K (A, n) \to K (A, n + 1)$ classifies $σ ι_{n}$ , then, for every $n \geq 1$ ,

$σ u_{n} = s_{n}^{*} u_{n + 1} .$

A stable operation indexed over all integers in the earlier definition necessarily has these positive-degree identities. They do not by themselves impose its separate degree-zero suspension identity.

Facts & Assumptions

[F1]

Every $x \in {\tilde{H}}^{n} (X; A)$ has a based classifying map $f : X \to K (A, n)$ with $x = f^{*} ι_{n}$ , unique up to based homotopy (Eilenberg--Mac Lane spaces represent singular cohomology).

[F2]

Singular cohomology pullback is contravariantly functorial (Singular cohomology is contravariantly functorial). For a based homotopy $H : f ≃ g$ , the singular-chain prism satisfies $g_{#} - f_{#} = \partial P_{H} + P_{H} \partial$ in every nonnegative degree (The singular chain homotopy formula).

[F3]

Full stability means commutation with reduced cohomology suspension in every integer source degree, including zero (Stable natural cohomology operation). Its positive-degree part is the condition characterized here.

[A1]

AC is inherited from [F1]'s arbitrary-cell realization and homotopy-extension argument (The Axiom of Choice).

Proof

Given: $A, B, n, r$ , the category of based CW complexes whose basepoints are vertices, and [A1].

1.1F1F2

If $Θ$ is natural, set $u = Θ_{K (A, n)} (ι_{n})$ . For $x = f^{*} ι_{n}$ as in [F1], naturality forces

$Θ_{X} (x) = Θ_{X} (f^{*} ι_{n}) = f^{*} Θ_{K (A, n)} (ι_{n}) = f^{*} u .$

Thus $u$ determines every value of $Θ$ . [F1, F2]

1.2F1F2

Conversely, fix $u \in {\tilde{H}}^{n + r} (K (A, n); B)$ . Given $x$ , choose its classifying map $f$ and define $Θ_{X}^{u} (x) = f^{*} u$ . If $f^{'}$ also classifies $x$ , [F1] makes $f$ and $f^{'}$ based-homotopic. For that based homotopy the prism in [F2] preserves chains of the basepoint, so precomposition with it gives a cochain homotopy on the relative singular cochains with arbitrary coefficient group $B$ . Thus $f^{*} u = f^{' *} u$ in reduced cohomology, including degree zero. Hence the definition is independent of the selected map.

2.1F1F2step 1.2

For the operation constructed in Step 1.2 and a based map $a : X^{'} \to X$ , the composite $f a$ classifies $a^{*} x$ . Therefore

$Θ_{X^{'}}^{u} (a^{*} x) = (f a)^{*} u = a^{*} f^{*} u = a^{*} Θ_{X}^{u} (x),$

so $Θ^{u}$ is natural. Its value on $ι_{n}$ , classified by the identity of $K (A, n)$ , is $u$ . Steps 1.1--2.1 show that the two assignments are inverse bijections. They never use an additive law. [F2, step 1.1, step 1.2]

3.1F2F3step 2.1

Suppose $(Θ_{n})_{n \geq 1}$ commutes with suspension in each positive source degree $n$ , and write $u_{n} = Θ_{n} (ι_{n})$ . This hypothesis holds in particular for the positive-degree part of a fully stable operation [F3]. Apply its suspension identity to $X = K (A, n)$ and $x = ι_{n}$ . Since $s_{n}$ classifies $σ ι_{n}$ , naturality from Step 2.1 gives

$σ u_{n} = Θ_{n + 1} (σ ι_{n}) = Θ_{n + 1} (s_{n}^{*} ι_{n + 1}) = s_{n}^{*} u_{n + 1} .$

[F2, F3]

4.1F2step 2.1step 3.1

Conversely, assume the displayed compatibility from Step 3.1 for every $n \geq 1$ . For $x = f^{*} ι_{n}$ in positive source degree, naturality of suspension and Step 2.1 give

$σ Θ_{n} (x) = (Σ f)^{*} σ u_{n} = (Σ f)^{*} s_{n}^{*} u_{n + 1} = Θ_{n + 1} (σ x) .$

Thus suspension commutes with the family at every positive source degree. This does not establish the $n = 0$ identity required by full stability in [F3]. For example, with $A = B = Z$ and $r = 0$ , take $Θ_{0} = id$ on ${\tilde{H}}^{0}$ , and $Θ_{n} = 0$ in all other degrees. Every positive-degree universal class is zero and satisfies the displayed compatibility, but suspension ${\tilde{H}}^{0} (S^{0}; Z) \to {\tilde{H}}^{1} (S^{1}; Z)$ is an isomorphism, so the degree-zero identity fails. Reduced and ordinary cohomology agree on connected CW complexes in every positive degree by [F1], giving the ordinary formulation when also $n + r > 0$ . At target degree zero they differ: for the one-point space, ${\tilde{H}}^{0} (*; B) = 0$ whereas $H^{0} (*; B) = B$ . Zero groups, negative target degree, the one-point space, and the zero universal class are included in the asserted reduced-cohomology result. AC is used only through [F1]. $□$ [A1, F1, F3, step 2.1, step 3.1]

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

24 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources

James Davis and Paul Kirk, Lecture Notes in Algebraic Topology (standard reference, not scraped)
Haynes Miller, MIT 18.906 Algebraic Topology II lecture notes (standard reference, not scraped)