How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The singular chain homotopy formula
Statement
Let be a homotopy from to . Then the prism operator of The prism operator of a homotopy satisfies as homomorphisms for every and every abelian group . In degree , the same identity reduces to
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A homotopy from to , an abelian group , and an integer .
The prism operator is on a singular -simplex (The prism operator of a homotopy).
The prism chain has boundary (The prism triangulation has the stated oriented boundary).
The induced singular map of a continuous map is obtained by postcomposition on singular simplices (The induced singular chain map of a continuous map).
The singular boundary is the alternating sum of affine face restrictions (The singular boundary operator).
Proof
If and is a singular -simplex, then [L2] gives . Composing with and using [L1] and [L3] yields
Assume and let be a singular -simplex. Compose the boundary formula [L2] with the continuous map By [L1] and [L3], the image of is , the image of is , and the image of is .
Again using [L1], [L3], and [L4], the image of the side-prism term under is exactly . Therefore step 1.2 becomes or equivalently
Singular simplices generate , and the coefficient- version is obtained by tensor extension, so step 2.1 holds on all chains for every , while step 1.1 handles degree . Hence the stated identities hold in all degrees.
Depends on
Used by
- Cohomology operations are universal classes on Eilenberg--Mac Lane spaces Corollary
- Homotopic maps induce the same map on singular homology Corollary
- Relative homology of a single handle pair Corollary
- Singular cohomology is homotopy invariant Corollary
- Singular cohomology satisfies the Eilenberg Steenrod cohomology axioms Corollary
- An unoriented real bundle has no integral Thom class Counterexample
- Absolute and relative Hurewicz homomorphisms Definition
- A simply connected CW homology equivalence is a homotopy equivalence under the stated choice conditions Example
- The prism operator for a path homotopy Example
- A CW quotient induces relative singular homology isomorphisms Lemma
- A multiple of a fork surface has a closed compact replacement Lemma
- Braid mapping classes lift equivariantly to the Burau cover Lemma
- Cartan coherence for higher diagonals Lemma
- Cellular reduction for a highly connected pair Lemma
- Collared gluing has relative excision and evaluation maps Lemma
- Fiber transport gives the Serre local systems Lemma
- Geometric Gauss-Manin Hodge variations and integral lattices Lemma
- Handle slides act by elementary basis change on handle chains Lemma
- Locally contractible metric spaces have singular constant sheaf cohomology Lemma
- One handle changes relative homology in one degree only Lemma
- Relative homology of the standard handle pair Lemma
- Serre-fibration replacement preserves fiber homology transport Lemma
- Singular product chain equivalence by simplex models Lemma
- Smooth Beltrami coefficients admit quasiconformal solutions Lemma
- Smooth orientation sign is the local integral homology multiplier Lemma
- The fork-noodle pairing is well defined and equivariant Lemma
- Universal-cover boundaries, maps and homotopies respect the right group-ring action Lemma
- Weak homotopy equivalences induce integral homology isomorphisms without choice Lemma
- Barycentric subdivision and prism preserve smooth singular chains Proposition
- The first Hurewicz map is abelianization Proposition
- Absolute Hurewicz theorem at the first nonzero degree Theorem
- Alexander--Whitney and shuffle are natural chain-homotopy inverses Theorem
- Cohomological Serre spectral sequence Theorem
- Compactness of the normalized K-quasiconformal self-maps of the sphere Theorem
- Homological Serre spectral sequence Theorem
- Homotopic maps induce equal maps in singular cohomology Theorem
- Naturality of the homological Serre spectral sequence Theorem
- Rational cohomology of Eilenberg–Mac Lane spaces in one generator Theorem
- Smooth singular chains compute singular homology Theorem
- The geometric and analytic definitions of quasiconformality agree Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
8 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Allen Hatcher, Algebraic Topology (standard reference, not scraped)
- Haynes Miller, Algebraic Topology I, Lecture 6 (standard reference, not scraped)