How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The composite of two subfields is the subfield generated by their union
Statement
If and are subfields of a field , then This common subfield is denoted and is called the composite of and .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Subfields .
For a subfield and , is the smallest subfield of containing (Field extensions, generated subrings , generated subfields , and simple extensions).
Proof
A subfield contains if and only if it contains and every element of .
By minimality, is the intersection of precisely the subfields described in step 1.1.
Interchanging and shows that is the same intersection.
Hence both generated fields equal the displayed intersection; denote it by .
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 16 results over 8 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- J. S. Milne, Fields and Galois Theory (standard reference, not scraped)