How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Inside a common extension, the splitting field of is the composite of the splitting fields of and
Statement
Let be nonzero. Inside a common field extension , let and be their respective splitting fields. Then the composite inside is a splitting field of over .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Nonzero and splitting fields .
A splitting field is the subfield generated over by all roots of the polynomial, over which that polynomial splits (Polynomials that split and splitting fields of a polynomial or a family of polynomials).
The composite is the smallest subfield of containing both and (The composite of two subfields is the subfield generated by their union).
Proof
Both and split over because the composite contains their splitting fields. Hence their product splits there.
In the field , an element is a root of exactly when , hence exactly when it is a root of or of . Therefore the field generated by the roots of is the field generated jointly by and , which is by [F2].
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 11 results over 4 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- J. S. Milne, Fields and Galois Theory, Chapter 2 (standard reference, not scraped)