How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Converse of Lagrange for finite abelian groups: every divisor occurs as a subgroup order
Statement
Let be finite abelian and let be a positive divisor of . Then has a subgroup of order .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The objects and hypotheses in the statement.
Let (def-integers). We say divides , and write , when the product being that of def-int-operations. We write when this fails. In this situation is called a divisor, or a factor, of , and is called a multiple of . This is the relation the library already has, not a second one. The published thm-division-algorithm-in-z introduces it in its own Statement, in these words: "We say divides , written , when for some ." Since multiplication on is commutative (thm-int-comm-ring), and are the same condition, so the definition above is that relation verbatim and the two usages agree everywhere. The theorem defined it for use on its own page and left the systematic theory to a later page; this is that page, and this item records the agreement rather than introducing a rival notion. The remainder test. For the same Statement records that holds exactly when the remainder in , , is . Boundary values. Each is one line from the ring axioms, and each is used below, so all three are recorded here rather than assumed: - for every integer , including , since ; - only for , since forces ; - and for every , since and . (Divisibility in : when for some integer ).
The order of a finite group. Let be a group (def-group) whose underlying set is finite (def-countable), so that for some (def-equinumerous). That natural number is unique: if and then , since is symmetric and transitive, and then by claim 3 of lem-pigeonhole. The order of is that unique natural number, written . A group is infinite when its underlying set is not finite, and is then not defined. The order of an element. Let be any group and , with natural powers as in def-group-power. Put - If , the order of is its least element, which exists by the well-ordering principle (thm-well-ordering-principle): every nonempty subset of has a least element, and that element is unique, being every element of and a member of it. We then say has finite order. - If we say has infinite order and write , where is a symbol reserved for this case and is not a natural number. No arithmetic is performed with it here. By construction whenever it is finite, and exactly when , since . Every element of a finite group has finite order. If is finite then for every , by lem-order-of-element-exists, so is a natural number. (The order of a finite group and the order of an element, with when no positive power of is the identity).
Let be a property of naturals such that for every , if holds for all then . Then holds for all . (At the hypothesis is vacuous, so is forced.) (Strong (complete) induction).
Let with , and put (def-divides-in-z). Then is nonempty and has a least element , and is prime (def-prime). In particular every integer greater than has a prime divisor. (Every integer has a prime divisor; indeed the least divisor of that exceeds is prime).
Let be a finite abelian group and let be a prime dividing . Then contains an element, and hence a subgroup, of order . (Cauchy's theorem for finite abelian groups).
Let be a group and let be a normal subgroup (def-normal-subgroup). The quotient group, or factor group, has the left cosets as its elements (def-coset, def-index), with product Independence of the chosen representatives is proved in thm-coset-multiplication-well-defined-iff-normal, and the group axioms are proved in thm-quotient-group-laws. (The quotient group and coset product ).
If is abelian and , then is abelian. (Every quotient group of an abelian group is abelian).
Let . If is finite, then the quotient group is finite and In particular, if is finite, then (If is finite then ; for finite this equals ).
Correspondence theorem: subgroups of correspond to subgroups of containing , with normality preserved. For , the maps and are inverse inclusion-preserving bijections between subgroups with and subgroups ; they preserve normality. (Correspondence theorem: subgroups of correspond to subgroups of containing , with normality preserved).
Proof
Use strong induction on . If , take the trivial subgroup; this also settles the trivial group.
For , choose a prime . Cauchy's theorem gives a subgroup of order , and is finite abelian of order .
The integer divides , so induction gives a subgroup of order .
By correspondence its full preimage has . The case returns .
Depends on
- Divisibility in $\mathbb{Z}$: $d \mid a$ when $a = dq$ for some integer $q$
- The order $|G|$ of a finite group and the order $\operatorname{ord}(g)$ of an element, with $\operatorname{ord}(g) = \infty$ when no positive power of $g$ is the identity
- Strong (complete) induction
- Every integer $n > 1$ has a prime divisor; indeed the least divisor of $n$ that exceeds $1$ is prime
- Cauchy's theorem for finite abelian groups
- The quotient group $G/N$ and coset product $(gN)(hN)=ghN$
- Every quotient group of an abelian group is abelian
- If $[G:N]$ is finite then $|G/N|=[G:N]$; for finite $G$ this equals $|G|/|N|$
- Correspondence theorem: subgroups of $G/N$ correspond to subgroups of $G$ containing $N$, with normality preserved
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 101 results over 21 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Thomas W. Judson, Abstract Algebra: Theory and Applications, Ch. 13, Exercise 6 (standard reference, not scraped)