Alphabeta Math
CorollaryStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passaudited 2026-08-11
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Converse of Lagrange for finite abelian groups: every divisor occurs as a subgroup order

Statement

Let GG be finite abelian and let dd be a positive divisor of G|G|. Then GG has a subgroup of order dd.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The objects and hypotheses in the statement.

[L1]

Let d,aZd, a \in \mathbb{Z} (def-integers). We say dd divides aa, and write dad \mid a, when a  =  dqfor some qZ,a \;=\; d q \qquad \text{for some } q \in \mathbb{Z}, the product being that of def-int-operations. We write dad \nmid a when this fails. In this situation dd is called a divisor, or a factor, of aa, and aa is called a multiple of dd. This is the relation the library already has, not a second one. The published thm-division-algorithm-in-z introduces it in its own Statement, in these words: "We say bb divides aa, written bab \mid a, when a=qba = qb for some qZq \in \mathbb{Z}." Since multiplication on Z\mathbb{Z} is commutative (thm-int-comm-ring), a=qda = qd and a=dqa = dq are the same condition, so the definition above is that relation verbatim and the two usages agree everywhere. The theorem defined it for use on its own page and left the systematic theory to a later page; this is that page, and this item records the agreement rather than introducing a rival notion. The remainder test. For b>0b > 0 the same Statement records that bab \mid a holds exactly when the remainder rr in a=qb+ra = qb + r, 0r<b0 \le r < b, is 00. Boundary values. Each is one line from the ring axioms, and each is used below, so all three are recorded here rather than assumed: - d0d \mid 0 for every integer dd, including d=0d = 0, since 0=d00 = d \cdot 0; - 0a0 \mid a only for a=0a = 0, since a=0qa = 0 \cdot q forces a=0a = 0; - 1a1 \mid a and aaa \mid a for every aa, since a=1aa = 1 \cdot a and a=a1a = a \cdot 1. (Divisibility in Z\mathbb{Z}: dad \mid a when a=dqa = dq for some integer qq).

[L2]

The order of a finite group. Let GG be a group (def-group) whose underlying set is finite (def-countable), so that GnG \approx n for some nNn \in \mathbb{N} (def-equinumerous). That natural number is unique: if GnG \approx n and GnG \approx n' then nnn \approx n', since \approx is symmetric and transitive, and then n=nn = n' by claim 3 of lem-pigeonhole. The order of GG is that unique natural number, written G|G|. A group is infinite when its underlying set is not finite, and G|G| is then not defined. The order of an element. Let GG be any group and gGg \in G, with natural powers as in def-group-power. Put Sg  :=  {kN  :  k1 and gk=e}    N.S_g \;:=\; \{\, k \in \mathbb{N} \;:\; k \ge 1 \text{ and } g^{k} = e \,\} \;\subseteq\; \mathbb{N}. - If SgS_g \ne \varnothing, the order of gg is its least element, ord(g)  :=  minSg    N,\operatorname{ord}(g) \;:=\; \min S_g \;\in\; \mathbb{N}, which exists by the well-ordering principle (thm-well-ordering-principle): every nonempty subset of N\mathbb{N} has a least element, and that element is unique, being \le every element of SgS_g and a member of it. We then say gg has finite order. - If Sg=S_g = \varnothing we say gg has infinite order and write ord(g)=\operatorname{ord}(g) = \infty, where \infty is a symbol reserved for this case and is not a natural number. No arithmetic is performed with it here. By construction ord(g)1\operatorname{ord}(g) \ge 1 whenever it is finite, and ord(g)=1\operatorname{ord}(g) = 1 exactly when g=eg = e, since g1=gg^{1} = g. Every element of a finite group has finite order. If GG is finite then SgS_g \ne \varnothing for every gGg \in G, by lem-order-of-element-exists, so ord(g)\operatorname{ord}(g) is a natural number. (The order G|G| of a finite group and the order ord(g)\operatorname{ord}(g) of an element, with ord(g)=\operatorname{ord}(g) = \infty when no positive power of gg is the identity).

[L3]

Let PP be a property of naturals such that for every nNn \in \mathbb{N}, if P(m)P(m) holds for all m<nm < n then P(n)P(n). Then P(n)P(n) holds for all nNn \in \mathbb{N}. (At n=0n = 0 the hypothesis is vacuous, so P(0)P(0) is forced.) (Strong (complete) induction).

[L4]

Let nZn \in \mathbb{Z} with n>1n > 1, and put S  :=  {dZ  :  dn  and  d>1}S \;:=\; \{\, d \in \mathbb{Z} \;:\; d \mid n \ \text{ and } \ d > 1 \,\} (def-divides-in-z). Then SS is nonempty and has a least element qq, and qq is prime (def-prime). In particular every integer greater than 11 has a prime divisor. (Every integer n>1n > 1 has a prime divisor; indeed the least divisor of nn that exceeds 11 is prime).

[L5]

Let GG be a finite abelian group and let pp be a prime dividing G|G|. Then GG contains an element, and hence a subgroup, of order pp. (Cauchy's theorem for finite abelian groups).

[L6]

Let GG be a group and let NGN\mathrel{\trianglelefteq}G be a normal subgroup (def-normal-subgroup). The quotient group, or factor group, G/NG/N has the left cosets G/N:={gN:gG}G/N:=\{gN:g\in G\} as its elements (def-coset, def-index), with product (gN)(hN):=ghN. (gN)(hN):=ghN. Independence of the chosen representatives is proved in thm-coset-multiplication-well-defined-iff-normal, and the group axioms are proved in thm-quotient-group-laws. (The quotient group G/NG/N and coset product (gN)(hN)=ghN(gN)(hN)=ghN).

[L7]

If GG is abelian and NGN\mathrel{\trianglelefteq}G, then G/NG/N is abelian. (Every quotient group of an abelian group is abelian).

[L8]

Let NGN\mathrel{\trianglelefteq}G. If [G:N][G:N] is finite, then the quotient group G/NG/N is finite and G/N=[G:N].|G/N|=[G:N]. In particular, if GG is finite, then G/N=GN.|G/N|=\frac{|G|}{|N|}. (If [G:N][G:N] is finite then G/N=[G:N]|G/N|=[G:N]; for finite GG this equals G/N|G|/|N|).

[L9]

Correspondence theorem: subgroups of G/NG/N correspond to subgroups of GG containing NN, with normality preserved. For NGN\mathrel{\trianglelefteq}G, the maps HH/NH\mapsto H/N and Kπ1(K)K\mapsto\pi^{-1}(K) are inverse inclusion-preserving bijections between subgroups HH with NHGN\le H\le G and subgroups KG/NK\le G/N; they preserve normality. (Correspondence theorem: subgroups of G/NG/N correspond to subgroups of GG containing NN, with normality preserved).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Use strong induction on G|G|. If d=1d=1, take the trivial subgroup; this also settles the trivial group.

givenL1L2L3L4L5L6L7L8L9
2.1

For d>1d>1, choose a prime pdp\mid d. Cauchy's theorem gives a subgroup HGH\le G of order pp, and G/HG/H is finite abelian of order G/p|G|/p.

step 1.1
3.1

The integer d/pd/p divides G/H|G/H|, so induction gives a subgroup K/HG/HK/H\le G/H of order d/pd/p.

step 2.1
4.1

By correspondence its full preimage KGK\le G has K=HK/H=d|K|=|H|\,|K/H|=d. The case d=Gd=|G| returns K=GK=G.

step 3.1

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · next 3 levels

Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 101 results over 21 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.

Sources