Alphabeta Math
CorollaryStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-13
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Over a field, for each right-hand side b, Ax=b has a unique solution exactly when det⁡(A) is nonzero, and then Cramer's quotient formula holds

Statement

Let F be a field, n≥1, A∈Mn(F), and fix b∈Fn. The system Ax=b has a unique solution if and only if det⁡(A)≠0. In that case

xj=det⁡(Aj(b))det⁡(A)(0≤j<n).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: F,n,A,b as in the statement.

[F1]
[L1]

Over a commutative ring, a unit determinant gives the unique Cramer solution xj=det⁡(A)−1det⁡(Aj(b)) (Cramer's rule over a commutative ring: every solution satisfies det⁡(A)xj=det⁡(Aj(b)), and a unit determinant gives the unique quotient formula).

[L2]
[L3]

A positive-sized square matrix over a commutative ring is invertible exactly when its determinant is a unit (A positive-sized square matrix over a commutative ring is invertible if and only if its determinant is a unit).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

If det⁡(A)≠0, it is a unit by [F1], so [L1] gives the unique solution and the displayed quotient formula.

F1L1
1.2

Conversely, suppose Ax=b has the unique solution x. If Az=0, then A(x+z)=b by distributivity, so uniqueness gives z=0. Thus the kernel of A is zero.

L4given
2.1

By [L2], step 1.2 makes A invertible. By [L3] and [F1], det⁡(A) is a unit and hence is nonzero.

step 1.2L2L3F1
3.1

Steps 1.1 and 2.1 prove both directions.

step 1.1step 2.1∎

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

33 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources