Alphabeta Math
CorollaryStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passaudited 2026-08-13
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Over a field, for each right-hand side b, Ax=b has a unique solution exactly when det(A) is nonzero, and then Cramer's quotient formula holds

Statement

Let F be a field, n1, AMn(F), and fix bFn. The system Ax=b has a unique solution if and only if det(A)0. In that case

xj=det(Aj(b))det(A)(0j<n).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: F,n,A,b as in the statement.

[F1]
[L1]

Over a commutative ring, a unit determinant gives the unique Cramer solution xj=det(A)1det(Aj(b)) (Cramer's rule over a commutative ring: every solution satisfies det(A)xj=det(Aj(b)), and a unit determinant gives the unique quotient formula).

[L2]
[L3]

A positive-sized square matrix over a commutative ring is invertible exactly when its determinant is a unit (A positive-sized square matrix over a commutative ring is invertible if and only if its determinant is a unit).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

If det(A)0, it is a unit by [F1], so [L1] gives the unique solution and the displayed quotient formula.

F1L1
1.2

Conversely, suppose Ax=b has the unique solution x. If Az=0, then A(x+z)=b by distributivity, so uniqueness gives z=0. Thus the kernel of A is zero.

L4given
2.1

By [L2], step 1.2 makes A invertible. By [L3] and [F1], det(A) is a unit and hence is nonzero.

step 1.2L2L3F1
3.1

Steps 1.1 and 2.1 prove both directions.

step 1.1step 2.1

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · next 3 levels

Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 76 results over 20 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.

Sources