Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-13
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Cramer's rule over a commutative ring: every solution satisfies det⁡(A)xj=det⁡(Aj(b)), and a unit determinant gives the unique quotient formula

Statement

Let R be a commutative ring, n≥1, A∈Mn(R), and b∈Rn. Let Aj(b) be obtained from A by replacing column j by b. Every solution x of Ax=b satisfies

det⁡(A)xj=det⁡(Aj(b))(0≤j<n).

If det⁡(A) is a unit, the solution is unique and

xj=det⁡(A)−1det⁡(Aj(b)).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: R,n,A,b,j as in the statement, and a solution x when the first claim is used.

[L2]

Laplace expansion along a column computes the determinant as the sum of its entries times their cofactors (Laplace expansion computes the determinant along every row and every column over a commutative ring).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

If Ax=b, then b=∑kxkAk, where Ak is column k of A.

F1given
1.2

Now suppose u:=det⁡(A) is a unit. By [L3], A is invertible, so x=A−1b=u−1adj⁡(A)b is the unique solution.

L3L4
2.1

Replace column j by the sum from step 1.1 and use column multilinearity. Every term with k≠j has two equal columns and vanishes; the term k=j is xjdet⁡(A). Thus det⁡(Aj(b))=xjdet⁡(A).

step 1.1L1
2.2

Its jth coordinate is u−1∑iCij(A)bi. Deleting column j removes the replaced column, so Cij(Aj(b))=Cij(A); expanding Aj(b) along column j therefore identifies the sum as det⁡(Aj(b)).

step 1.2F1L2
3.1

Step 2.1 proves the unconditional cross-multiplied identity, and step 2.2 proves the quotient formula and uniqueness under the unit hypothesis.

step 2.1step 2.2∎

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

22 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources