Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-13
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Laplace expansion computes the determinant along every row and every column over a commutative ring

Statement

Let R be a commutative ring, n≥1, and A=(aij)∈Mn(R). For every row i and every column j,

det⁡(A)=∑k=0n−1aikCik(A)anddet⁡(A)=∑k=0n−1akjCkj(A).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: R,n,A,i,j as in the statement.

[F1]

Cik(A)=(−1)i+kdet⁡(A(i,k)), with the determinant of the 0×0 minor defined to be 1 (Deleted-row-and-column minors, cofactors, the cofactor matrix and the adjugate over a commutative ring).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

If n=1, both displayed sums have one term, a00(−1)0⋅1=a00=det⁡(A).

F1L1algebra
1.2

Suppose n>1. In the Leibniz sum for det⁡(A), group the terms according to the unique column k whose chosen entry lies in row i.

L1
2.1

After the factor aik is removed, the remaining choices are exactly the permutations contributing to det⁡(A(i,k)). Moving row i and column k to the last positions takes (n−1−i)+(n−1−k) transpositions, whose parity is the parity of i+k; hence the sign contribution is (−1)i+k.

step 1.2algebra
3.1

Summing the groups in step 2.1 gives det⁡(A)=∑kaik(−1)i+kdet⁡(A(i,k))=∑kaikCik(A).

step 2.1F1
4.1

Apply the row formula from step 3.1 to AT. Its row-j cofactors are the column-j cofactors of A, and [L2] identifies the two determinants, giving the column formula.

step 3.1L2F1
5.1

Steps 1.1, 3.1, and 4.1 prove both formulas for every n≥1.

step 1.1step 3.1step 4.1∎

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

18 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources