Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passaudited 2026-08-13
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Laplace expansion computes the determinant along every row and every column over a commutative ring

Statement

Let R be a commutative ring, n1, and A=(aij)Mn(R). For every row i and every column j,

det(A)=k=0n1aikCik(A)anddet(A)=k=0n1akjCkj(A).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: R,n,A,i,j as in the statement.

[F1]

Cik(A)=(1)i+kdet(A(i,k)), with the determinant of the 0×0 minor defined to be 1 (Deleted-row-and-column minors, cofactors, the cofactor matrix and the adjugate over a commutative ring).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

If n=1, both displayed sums have one term, a00(1)01=a00=det(A).

F1L1algebra
1.2

Suppose n>1. In the Leibniz sum for det(A), group the terms according to the unique column k whose chosen entry lies in row i.

L1
2.1

After the factor aik is removed, the remaining choices are exactly the permutations contributing to det(A(i,k)). Moving row i and column k to the last positions takes (n1i)+(n1k) transpositions, whose parity is the parity of i+k; hence the sign contribution is (1)i+k.

step 1.2algebra
3.1

Summing the groups in step 2.1 gives det(A)=kaik(1)i+kdet(A(i,k))=kaikCik(A).

step 2.1F1
4.1

Apply the row formula from step 3.1 to AT. Its row-j cofactors are the column-j cofactors of A, and [L2] identifies the two determinants, giving the column formula.

step 3.1L2F1
5.1

Steps 1.1, 3.1, and 4.1 prove both formulas for every n1.

step 1.1step 3.1step 4.1

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · next 3 levels

Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 59 results over 11 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.

Sources