How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Ramification primes of a reduced cyclotomic conductor
Statement
Let be a reduced index, that is, is odd or , and let . A rational prime ramifies in — that is, in the factorisation of some prime ideal occurs with exponent at least — if and only if .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A reduced index , a primitive -th root of unity , the field , a rational prime , and the factorisation with (so is the -adic valuation of and exactly when ).
By the prime factorisation theorem for reduced indices, with pairwise distinct primes ; in particular every prime above has exponent exactly in , so is unramified in if and only if (Prime factorisation in a cyclotomic field).
For a prime and , , and ; hence for one has exactly when and (For a prime and , ).
Since is reduced, is odd or ; consequently, if then , so the exponent is not — it is either or at least . [definition of reduced index, arithmetic]
Proof
If then , while if then holds exactly for , ; hence if and only if , or and .
If then ; if moreover then by [F3], so the exceptional case , of step 1.1 cannot occur for the reduced index .
Combining steps 1.1 and 2.1: when we have and , and when we have with , hence .
By [F1] the ramification behaviour of is read off from the single exponent : is unramified exactly when and ramified exactly when . Step 3.1 therefore gives: implies and unramified, while implies and ramified. Hence ramifies in if and only if .
Remarks
- Reducedness is essential for the converse. For the non-reduced index one has and divides although is unramified; the exclusion of indices is exactly what makes "" equivalent to ramification here.
- Prime divisors of the conductor. Once the companion conductor theorem identifies the reduced index with the conductor (Cyclotomic conductor of a full cyclotomic field) of , the corollary reads: the ramified primes are exactly the prime divisors of the conductor, and away from them the Frobenius is the power map by Arithmetic Frobenius is the power map in an unramified cyclotomic field.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
34 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- J. S. Milne, Algebraic Number Theory, Ch. 6, Theorem 6.4 and Remark 6.6 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Conrad-Landesman, Math 154 Algebraic Number Theory, Ch. 11, Theorem 11.6 and Remark 11.7 (standard reference, not scraped)