Alphabeta Math
CorollaryStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)audited 2026-10-02
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Ramification primes of a reduced cyclotomic conductor

Statement

Let f≥1 be a reduced index, that is, f is odd or 4∣f, and let K=Q(ζf). A rational prime ℓ ramifies in K — that is, in the factorisation of ℓOK some prime ideal occurs with exponent at least 2 — if and only if ℓ∣f.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A reduced index f≥1, a primitive f-th root of unity ζf, the field K=Q(ζf), a rational prime ℓ, and the factorisation f=ℓam with gcd⁡(ℓ,m)=1 (so a is the ℓ-adic valuation of f and ℓ∤f exactly when a=0).

[F1]

By the prime factorisation theorem for reduced indices, ℓOK=(P1⋯Pg)e,e=φ(ℓa), with pairwise distinct primes P1,…,Pg; in particular every prime above ℓ has exponent exactly e in ℓOK, so ℓ is unramified in K if and only if e=1 (Prime factorisation in a cyclotomic field).

[F2]

For a prime ℓ and a≥1, φ(ℓa)=ℓa−ℓa−1=ℓa−1(ℓ−1), and φ(1)=1; hence for a≥1 one has φ(ℓa)=1 exactly when ℓ=2 and a=1 (For a prime p and k≥1, φ(pk)=pk−pk−1).

[F3]

Since f is reduced, f is odd or 4∣f; consequently, if 2∣f then 4∣f, so the exponent a=v2(f) is not 1 — it is either 0 or at least 2. [definition of reduced index, arithmetic]

Proof

technique · direct
1.1F2

If a=0 then e=φ(1)=1, while if a≥1 then e=ℓa−1(ℓ−1)=1 holds exactly for ℓ=2, a=1; hence e=1 if and only if a=0, or ℓ=2 and a=1.

2.1F3

If ℓ∣f then a≥1; if moreover ℓ=2 then a≥2 by [F3], so the exceptional case ℓ=2, a=1 of step 1.1 cannot occur for the reduced index f.

3.1step 1.1step 2.1

Combining steps 1.1 and 2.1: when ℓ∤f we have a=0 and e=1, and when ℓ∣f we have a≥1 with (ℓ,a)≠(2,1), hence e≥2.

4.1F1step 3.1∎

By [F1] the ramification behaviour of ℓ is read off from the single exponent e: ℓ is unramified exactly when e=1 and ramified exactly when e≥2. Step 3.1 therefore gives: ℓ∤f implies e=1 and ℓ unramified, while ℓ∣f implies e≥2 and ℓ ramified. Hence ℓ ramifies in K=Q(ζf) if and only if ℓ∣f.

Remarks

  • Reducedness is essential for the converse. For the non-reduced index f=6 one has Q(ζ6)=Q(ζ3) and ℓ=2 divides f although 2 is unramified; the exclusion of indices f≡2(mod4) is exactly what makes "ℓ∣f" equivalent to ramification here.
  • Prime divisors of the conductor. Once the companion conductor theorem identifies the reduced index f with the conductor (Cyclotomic conductor of a full cyclotomic field) of Q(ζf), the corollary reads: the ramified primes are exactly the prime divisors of the conductor, and away from them the Frobenius is the power map by Arithmetic Frobenius is the power map in an unramified cyclotomic field.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

34 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources