Alphabeta Math
CorollaryStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The n-dimensional Heisenberg uncertainty inequality

Statement

Assume Countable Choice. Let n≥1 and let f∈H1(Rn;C) satisfy xf∈L2(Rn;Cn). Write f^=F2f for its Plancherel transform. Then ∥∣x∣f∥2 ∥∣ξ∣f^∥2≥n4π∥f∥22. The Fourier characterization of H1 makes this exactly the domain where both spatial and Plancherel-frequency second moments are finite. For f=0 both sides vanish. Equality cases on this full domain are not decided here; the published sharp equality theorem is stated for Schwartz functions.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Countable Choice, n≥1, f∈H1(Rn;C) with xf∈L2(Rn;Cn), its weak derivatives Djf, and its Plancherel transform f^=F2f.

[A1]

Countable Choice is the hypothesis carried by the Sobolev, multiplier, and Plancherel interfaces below (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)).

[F1]

The integer-order Fourier characterization identifies H1 with W1,2 and hence supplies every Djf∈L2 (Integer-order W^{k,2} and H^k agree with equivalent norms).

[F2]

For a weak derivative in L2, F2(Djf)(ξ)=2πiξjF2f(ξ) almost everywhere (Distributional derivatives are polynomial Fourier multipliers).

[F3]

Plancherel is a complex-linear isometry on L2 (Plancherel theorem).

[F4]

Cauchy–Schwarz for finite tuples in complex L2 gives ∑j=1najbj≤(∑jaj2)1/2(∑jbj2)1/2 for nonnegative real aj,bj (Complex completeness, density, and inner product: the consumer interface).

[F5]

The coordinate estimate ∥xjf∥2∥Djf∥2≥12∥f∥22 holds on this H1-with-finite-spatial-moment domain (The coordinate inequality ∥xjf∥2∥Djf∥2≥12∥f∥22).

Proof

technique · convert the coordinate estimate by Plancherel, sum, and apply finite-dimensional Cauchy–Schwarz
1.1A1F1F2F3F5given

Fix j∈{1,…,n}. By [F1] the weak derivative Djf is in L2, and by [F2]–[F3] ∥Djf∥2=∥F2(Djf)∥2=2π∥ξjf^∥2. Applying the coordinate estimate [F5] and dividing by 2π yields ∥xjf∥2 ∥ξjf^∥2≥14π∥f∥22.

2.1F4step 1.1∎

Summing the inequalities of step 1.1 gives ∑j=1n∥xjf∥2 ∥ξjf^∥2≥n4π∥f∥22. By [F4] the left side is at most (∑j∥xjf∥22)1/2(∑j∥ξjf^∥22)1/2=∥∣x∣f∥2 ∥∣ξ∣f^∥2, where the equalities follow by summing the coordinate integrals. This proves the asserted inequality, including n=1.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

43 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources