How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Distance to an annihilator is the restriction norm
Statement
Let or . If is a closed linear subspace of a normed and , then
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The spaces, maps, scalar field, and hypotheses in the statement above. All duals consist of linear functionals over the ambient field; evaluation has no conjugation.
From The dual of a closed subspace is a dual quotient, with its stated hypotheses: Let or . Let be normed and closed. Restriction induces a linear isometric bijection Also ; its norm is when and when .
Proof
The quotient norm is , since is a linear subspace.
The restriction isometry identifies this quotient norm with . For both sides vanish; gives zero and gives .
Depends on
Used by
- Banach closed-range theorem Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
5 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Bühler–Salamon, Functional Analysis, Corollary 2.58, (2.33), p.85 (standard reference, not scraped)