Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-07
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The dual of a closed subspace is a dual quotient

Statement

Let K=R or C. Let X be normed and MX closed. Restriction R:XM induces a linear isometric bijection R~:X/MM,f+MfM. Also R1; its norm is 1 when M{0} and 0 when M={0}.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The spaces, maps, scalar field, and hypotheses in the statement above. All duals consist of linear functionals over the ambient field; evaluation has no conjugation.

[F1]

From Annihilator notation and the preannihilator, with its stated hypotheses: Let K=R or C. For a normed X and arbitrary subsets MX, NX, define M={fX:f(m)=0 for all mM},N={xX:f(x)=0 for all fN}. Here X is def-dual-space-of-a-normed-space. The first notation agrees with def-continuous-annihilator-of-a-subspace on spanM, since linearity makes vanishing on M equivalent to vanishing on its span. The preannihilator lies in X, not in X. Empty sets impose no conditions: =X and =X.

[F2]

From Annihilators and preannihilators are norm closed, with its stated hypotheses: Let K=R or C. For any normed X and arbitrary MX, NX, both MX and NX are norm-closed linear subspaces. Moreover N(N).

[F3]

From A bounded operator that vanishes on a subspace factors uniquely through the normed quotient, with its stated hypotheses: Let X and Y be normed spaces over the same scalar field, let MX be a closed linear subspace, let q:XX/M be the quotient map, and let T:XY be a bounded linear operator with MkerT. Then there is a unique bounded linear operator T:X/MY such that Tq=T, and moreover T=T.

[F4]

From A bounded linear functional on an arbitrary subspace extends with the same norm, without assuming the subspace is closed, with its stated hypotheses: Let X be a normed space over R or C, let MX be a linear subspace, and let f0:MR or f0:MC be a bounded linear functional over the ambient scalar field. Then there exists a bounded linear extension F of f0 to all of X such that F=f0. No closedness hypothesis on M is needed.

Proof

1.1

The inequality fMf makes restriction bounded. Its kernel is M, which is closed. Thus equal cosets have equal restrictions, and the quotient universal property gives a bounded linear induced map; the kernel calculation makes it injective.

F1F2F3
2.1

For hM, norm-preserving extension gives fX with fM=h and f=h, proving surjectivity. Every other representative f+a, aM, restricts to h, so f+ah. Taking the infimum and using this extension proves f+M=h.

F4step 1.1
3.1

If M{0}, fix mM{0}. The functional λmλm on its line has norm one. Extend first to M and then to X by norm-preserving extension; its restriction and extension both have norm one, so R1. If M={0}, R=0. For M=X the induced map is the identity, including the zero ambient space.

F4step 1.1step 2.1

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

14 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources