How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The dual of a closed subspace is a dual quotient
Statement
Let or . Let be normed and closed. Restriction induces a linear isometric bijection Also ; its norm is when and when .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The spaces, maps, scalar field, and hypotheses in the statement above. All duals consist of linear functionals over the ambient field; evaluation has no conjugation.
From Annihilator notation and the preannihilator, with its stated hypotheses: Let or . For a normed and arbitrary subsets , , define Here is def-dual-space-of-a-normed-space. The first notation agrees with def-continuous-annihilator-of-a-subspace on , since linearity makes vanishing on equivalent to vanishing on its span. The preannihilator lies in , not in . Empty sets impose no conditions: and .
From Annihilators and preannihilators are norm closed, with its stated hypotheses: Let or . For any normed and arbitrary , , both and are norm-closed linear subspaces. Moreover .
From A bounded operator that vanishes on a subspace factors uniquely through the normed quotient, with its stated hypotheses: Let and be normed spaces over the same scalar field, let be a closed linear subspace, let be the quotient map, and let be a bounded linear operator with . Then there is a unique bounded linear operator such that and moreover .
From A bounded linear functional on an arbitrary subspace extends with the same norm, without assuming the subspace is closed, with its stated hypotheses: Let be a normed space over or , let be a linear subspace, and let or be a bounded linear functional over the ambient scalar field. Then there exists a bounded linear extension of to all of such that . No closedness hypothesis on is needed.
Proof
The inequality makes restriction bounded. Its kernel is , which is closed. Thus equal cosets have equal restrictions, and the quotient universal property gives a bounded linear induced map; the kernel calculation makes it injective.
For , norm-preserving extension gives with and , proving surjectivity. Every other representative , , restricts to , so . Taking the infimum and using this extension proves .
If , fix . The functional on its line has norm one. Extend first to and then to by norm-preserving extension; its restriction and extension both have norm one, so . If , . For the induced map is the identity, including the zero ambient space.
Depends on
- Annihilator notation and the preannihilator
- Annihilators and preannihilators are norm closed
- A bounded operator that vanishes on a subspace factors uniquely through the normed quotient
- A bounded linear functional on an arbitrary subspace extends with the same norm, without assuming the subspace is closed
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
14 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Bühler–Salamon, Functional Analysis, Corollary 2.57(i), pp.84–85 (standard reference, not scraped)