How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The choice of admissible dyadic partition does not change the Lp square-function space
Statement
Assume Countable Choice. Call an inhomogeneous dyadic frequency partition admissible when it is obtained as in Existence of a smooth inhomogeneous dyadic frequency partition from some radial cutoff satisfying the standing hypotheses. Let and be two admissible partitions with associated square functions and . Then for every there are constants , depending only on and the two cutoffs, such that for every Moreover the mixed pieces are almost orthogonal: whenever , and each mixed operator is the Fourier multiplier with symbol supported in . For these are intersections of the corresponding annular supports; if either index is zero, use the actual low-frequency ball support of that block.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Countable Choice, two admissible partitions , with cutoffs and operators ; a real ; a function .
Littlewood-Paley square-function equivalence on Lp for 1<p<infinity applies to each admissible partition separately: for the partition there are constants depending only on and the cutoff with for all , and for the partition there are constants depending only on and with .
For each of the two admissible partitions, every fixed dyadic piece is a bounded operator on and agrees with its convolution representative; the composition on has symbol (Dyadic pieces are uniformly Mihlin multipliers and uniformly Lp-bounded, The inhomogeneous dyadic frequency partition and its Littlewood-Paley operators). Also is dense in for ( is dense in for ). For the supports satisfy and ; the low blocks satisfy and (The inhomogeneous dyadic frequency partition and its Littlewood-Paley operators, Existence of a smooth inhomogeneous dyadic frequency partition).
Proof
Comparability of the two square functions. By [F1] applied to , and ; eliminating gives , with constants depending only on and the two cutoffs.
The mixed pieces and their supports. For the composition rule [F2] gives , whose symbol is supported in . If , say , then (including , since its support lies in the radius-two ball) and , with , so the supports are disjoint and . Thus the mixed operator vanishes on ; by [F2] each fixed dyadic piece is bounded on , so its composition is bounded, and is dense in . Hence the identity extends to all of . The same argument applies when after interchanging the partitions. When the support intersection is the intersection of their annuli; if a low block occurs it is the intersection with that block's actual ball support from [F2].
Conclusion. Step 1.1 is the stated two-sided comparability with constants depending only on and the two cutoffs, and step 1.2 is the almost-orthogonality and support statement for the mixed pieces.
Depends on
- Existence of a smooth inhomogeneous dyadic frequency partition
- The inhomogeneous dyadic frequency partition and its Littlewood-Paley operators
- Littlewood-Paley square-function equivalence on Lp for 1<p<infinity
- The Axiom of Countable Choice ($\mathrm{AC}_\omega$)
- Dyadic pieces are uniformly Mihlin multipliers and uniformly Lp-bounded
- $C_c^\infty(\mathbb{R}^n)$ is dense in $L^p(\mathbb{R}^n)$ for $1 \le p < \infty$
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
52 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Terence Tao, Math 247A Lecture Notes 4 (UCLA, Fall 2006) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Loukas Grafakos, Classical Fourier Analysis, 3rd ed. (Springer GTM 249) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Mark Williams, Notes on Harmonic Analysis (January 11, 2022) (standard reference, not scraped)