How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Over a splitting field, every -endomorphism of an irreducible representation is scalar
Statement
Let be a finite group, let be a splitting field for , and let be an irreducible representation of over . Then every endomorphism in has the form with .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A finite group , a splitting field for , and an irreducible representation of over .
For an irreducible representation, is a division ring (Schur's lemma for irreducible representations: a nonzero intertwiner is an isomorphism, and is a division ring).
By definition, a splitting field for is a field over which every irreducible representation has endomorphism ring exactly (A splitting field for a finite group: every irreducible representation has scalar endomorphism ring).
Proof
By [L2], the endomorphism ring is exactly the scalar copy of inside .
Therefore every -endomorphism of is for a unique . Step 1.1 is compatible with the division-ring conclusion of [L1], which is why the scalar copy is a field.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
7 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Peter Webb, A Course in Finite Group Representation Theory, Proposition 9.2.5 (standard reference, not scraped)