Alphabeta Math
CorollaryStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-22
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Finite rank operators are norm dense in compact Hilbert space operators

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)). Let H and K be real or complex Hilbert spaces and let T∈B(H,K) be a compact operator (Compact linear operator). Relabel the singular system of T by positive integers, so its m-th vectors em,fm correspond to the numerical singular value sm(T)>0, for 1≤m≤r in rank r<+∞ and for every m≥1 in infinite rank. Let (sm(T))m≥1 be the zero-padded singular-value sequence (Singular value decomposition for compact operators, Absolute value and singular values of a compact operator). For n∈N put Tn:=∑1≤m≤n, sm(T)>0sm(T)⟨⋅,em⟩fm, with the empty sum T0=0. This is a finite-rank bounded operator, and ∥T−Tn∥=sn+1(T)for every n∈N, so ∥T−Tn∥→0 and T is the operator-norm limit of the finite-rank operators Tn. In particular the set of finite-rank operators is norm dense in the set of compact operators H→K: every compact operator is the norm limit of finite-rank operators.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Countable Choice, a compact T:H→K, its singular system and the truncations Tn.

[A1]

SVD data and relabelling. The SVD supplies orthonormal singular systems indexed by the positive singular values with multiplicity, together with the norm-convergent expansion of T and the corresponding partial-sum error estimate. In infinite rank its index set N is order-isomorphic to the positive integers via m↦m−1; after this relabelling, and without any choice, the m-th coefficient is the uniquely ordered numerical singular value sm(T). Thus Tx=∑m≥1sm(T)⟨x,em⟩fm and ∥T−Tn∥≤sn+1(T) whenever the (n+1)-st positive singular value exists. If r=dim⁡ran⁡T<+∞, then Tn=T for n≥r and sm(T)=0 for m>r (Singular value decomposition for compact operators, Absolute value and singular values of a compact operator).

[A2]

Finite rank. Each truncation Tn is a finite sum of rank-one operators ⟨⋅,ej⟩fj and therefore has finite rank, hence is compact and bounded (Finite-dimensional vector space, and its dimension dim⁡FV; infinite-dimensional means having no finite basis, Bounded finite rank operators are compact, A bounded linear operator between normed spaces).

[A3]

Norm test. The operator norm is the unit-ball supremum, so ∥S∥≥∥Sx∥ for every unit vector x and ∥S∥≤c follows from ∥Sx∥≤c for all unit vectors (The operator norm as the least bound and as the unit-sphere or unit-ball supremum); limits in operator norm are metric limits (Convergence of a sequence in a metric space: xk→x iff d(xk,x)→0 in R).

[A4]

Countable Choice is the standing hypothesis of this pair's Hilbert-space interface (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)).

Proof

technique · direct

Given: Countable Choice, the compact T and its finite-rank truncations Tn.

1.1A1

Upper bound. For every n∈N: if the (n+1)-st positive singular value exists then [A1] gives ∥T−Tn∥≤sn+1(T); otherwise r<+∞ and n≥r, so [A1] gives Tn=T and ∥T−Tn∥=0=sn+1(T). This includes T=0, when Tn=0=T for every n. Hence ∥T−Tn∥≤sn+1(T) for every n∈N.

1.2A1A3

Lower bound. Let n∈N. If the (n+1)-st positive singular value exists, then en+1 is a unit vector and the expansion [A1] gives (T−Tn)en+1=sn+1(T)fn+1, whence ∥T−Tn∥≥∥sn+1(T)fn+1∥=sn+1(T) by [A3]; otherwise Tn=T by [A1] and ∥T−Tn∥=0=sn+1(T). In every case ∥T−Tn∥≥sn+1(T).

2.1step 1.1step 1.2A1A2A3A4∎

Conclusion. Steps 1.1 and 1.2 give ∥T−Tn∥=sn+1(T) for every n∈N, and sn+1(T)→0 because (sm(T))m≥1 is nonincreasing and nonnegative, is eventually 0 in finite rank, and in infinite rank lists the positive eigenvalues of ∣T∣ with multiplicity with only 0 as an accumulation point [A1]; each Tn has finite rank by [A2], so the zero-based sequence (Tn)n∈N converges to T in operator norm, proving the asserted density statement.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

70 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources