How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The four-dimensional signature formula
Statement
Assume AC, inherited from the Hirzebruch signature theorem. For every closed oriented smooth -manifold , Consequently divides the Pontryagin number .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: AC; a closed oriented smooth -manifold .
is the first Pontryagin number, computed by the Kronecker pairing, which is linear (Pontryagin numbers of a closed oriented manifold, Kronecker evaluation pairing).
The signature is by definition the difference of two nonnegative integers, hence an integer (The signature of a closed oriented manifold of dimension divisible by four).
Proof
By [F1] and [F2], , using the -linearity of the Kronecker pairing [F3].
Divisibility: and with , so divides .
Steps 1.1 and 2.1 prove the displayed formula and the divisibility statement for every closed oriented smooth -manifold.
Depends on
Used by
- The signature theorem imposes divisibility constraints on Pontryagin numbers Corollary
- Signature and first Pontryagin number of the complex projective plane Example
- The orientation-reversed projective plane has signature minus one Example
- The signature of the product of two 2-spheres is zero: the hyperbolic intersection form Example
Dependency tree · two levels
46 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- John Milnor and James Stasheff, Characteristic Classes (re-typeset scan; original pagination) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Daniel S. Freed, Bordism: Old and New (lecture notes, UT Austin, Fall 2012) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Tom Weston, An Introduction to Cobordism Theory (lecture notes, Stanford) (standard reference, not scraped)