Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The signature of the product of two 2-spheres is zero: the hyperbolic intersection form

Example

Assume AC, inherited from Poincare duality, the Kuenneth suppliers and the signature definition. Equip S2 with its standard orientation and S2×S2 with the product orientation and product smooth structure. Let z∈H2(S2;Z) be the orientation class, characterized by ⟨z,[S2]⟩=1, and set a=pr1∗z, b=pr2∗z. Then H2(S2×S2;Z)=Za⊕Zb,a⋅a=0,b⋅b=0,a⋅b=1, so the middle-dimensional intersection form is the hyperbolic matrix (0110) and σ(S2×S2)=0. Consequently the first Pontryagin number vanishes: p1[S2×S2]=0.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC; the standard orientation of S2 with its orientation class z and fundamental class [S2]; the product orientation and product smooth structure on S2×S2; the projections pr1,pr2.

[F1]

For a commutative ring R that is a PID with either every Hq(Y;R) or every Hp(X;R) finite free over R, the external product is a graded-ring isomorphism H∗(X;R)⊗RH∗(Y;R)→H∗(X×Y;R); this uses AC (Cohomological Kunneth cross product is a ring isomorphism).

[F2]

For n≥1, H~k(Sn;G)=G for k=n and 0 otherwise, so H2(S2;Z)≅Z and H∗(S2;Z) is free (Homology of spheres). The fundamental class [S2] of Fundamental class of a compact oriented manifold restricts at every point to the local generator of the standard orientation, and for the compact connected boundaryless manifold S2 restriction to every local stalk is injective with image Z (Top homology of a connected manifold); hence under the identification H2(S2;Z)≅Z the class [S2] corresponds to ±1 and generates H2(S2;Z).

[F3]

For every space X and n≥0 the universal coefficient sequence 0→Ext⁡Z1(Hn−1(X;Z),G)→Hn(X;G)→Hom⁡Z(Hn(X;Z),G)→0 is natural with evaluation as the second map; this uses AC (Topological universal coefficient short exact sequence for cohomology). Over a field the evaluation map alone is an isomorphism (Cohomology over a field is dual to homology over that field).

[F4]

With the product orientation and product smooth structure, S2×S2 is a closed oriented smooth 4-manifold and [S2×S2]=[S2]×[S2] (Product orientations, The fundamental class of a product is the cross product of the fundamental classes, Products of smooth manifolds have a canonical product smooth structure).

[F5]

The Kronecker pairing is multiplicative under cross products: ⟨α×β,c×d⟩X×Y=⟨α,c⟩X⟨β,d⟩Y (The Kronecker pairing is multiplicative under cross products).

[F6]

The middle-dimensional intersection form is QM(x,y)=⟨x⌣y,[M]⟩ on H2k(M;R), it is symmetric and nondegenerate, and σ(M) is the positive minus the negative inertia index of QM (The middle-dimensional intersection form of a closed oriented 4k-manifold, The middle-dimensional intersection form is symmetric and nondegenerate, The signature of a closed oriented manifold of dimension divisible by four).

[F7]

For every closed oriented smooth 4-manifold M, p1[M]=3 σ(M) (The four-dimensional signature formula).

Verification

technique · compute the Kuenneth basis and evaluate the four products on the product fundamental class
1.1givenF2F3

By [F2], H∗(S2;Z) is free with H0(S2;Z)=Z⟨1⟩, the class [S2] generates H2(S2;Z)≅Z, and by [F3] applied to n=2 the evaluation H2(S2;Z)→Hom⁡Z(H2(S2;Z),Z) is an isomorphism because Ext⁡Z1(H1(S2;Z),Z)=0; hence the dual generator z is the unique class in H2(S2;Z) with ⟨z,[S2]⟩=1, and it is the orientation class of the statement.

2.1step 1.1F1F2F3

By [F1] with X=Y=S2 and R=Z, the cross product is a ring isomorphism H∗(S2;Z)⊗H∗(S2;Z)→H∗(S2×S2;Z); on degree two it identifies a=pr1∗z with z⊗1 and b=pr2∗z with 1⊗z, so H2(S2×S2;Z)=Za⊕Zb, while a⌣a corresponds to (z⌣z)⊗1, which is zero because H4(S2;Z)=0 by [F3] and [F2]; b⌣b=0 likewise.

3.1step 2.1F4F5F6

By [F4] the product is a closed oriented smooth 4-manifold with fundamental class [S2]×[S2], so by [F6] and [F5], Q(a,a)=⟨a⌣a,[S2]×[S2]⟩=0, Q(b,b)=0, and Q(a,b)=⟨a⌣b,[S2]×[S2]⟩=⟨z×z,[S2]×[S2]⟩=⟨z,[S2]⟩⟨z,[S2]⟩=1.

4.1step 3.1F1F3F6

By [F1] over R and field evaluation [F3], the coefficient images of a,b form a real basis (the normalized integral class z maps to the normalized real class); thus in the basis {a,b} the matrix of Q is the hyperbolic matrix (0110); the class a+b satisfies Q(a+b,a+b)=2>0 and a−b satisfies Q(a−b,a−b)=−2<0, and Q(a+b,a−b)=0. Since a+b,a−b form a basis, this diagonalizes the form to diag⁡(2,−2), so the inertia is (1,1,0) and [F6] gives σ(S2×S2)=1−1=0.

5.1step 4.1F7∎

By [F7], p1[S2×S2]=3σ(S2×S2)=3⋅0=0, as claimed.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

88 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources