Alphabeta Math
CorollaryStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-12
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Cohomology over a field is dual to homology over that field

Statement

Assume AC. For every field k, every space X, and n0, evaluation gives a natural k-linear isomorphism Hn(X;k)  Homk(Hn(X;k),k). There is no finite-dimensional hypothesis. The right side is the full algebraic dual.

Facts & Assumptions

[F1]

Singular cochain complex with coefficients identifies k-valued singular cochains with Homk(C(X;k),k); Singular cohomology with coefficients takes the cohomology quotient.

[F2]

Singular UCT extension from cycle projections gives the natural exact evaluation sequence over every PID, with the Ext term computed by restrictions from Zn1 to Bn1.

Proof

Given: k,X,n as stated and AC. Set C=C(X;k).

1.1

A field is a PID: any nonzero ideal contains a nonzero a, hence 1=a1a, and is the whole ring; the zero ideal is generated by zero. The complex C is nonnegative and free on the singular simplex sets. Thus [F2] applies, and [F1] identifies its middle group with Hn(X;k).

F1F2given
1.2

Put B=Bn1CZ=Zn1C. Apply [F3] first to the empty independent set in B to obtain a basis L of B, then to LZ to extend it to a basis T of Z. For any linear ψ:Bk, define a map on T by its existing values ψ(l) on L and zero on TL. Every vector of Z has a unique finite basis expansion, so summing its coefficients against these values defines a linear g:Zk with gB=ψ. Consequently restriction Homk(Z,k)Homk(B,k) is onto, and the cokernel Ext term in [F2] is zero.

F2F3given
2.1

Exactness from step 1.1 and vanishing from step 1.2 make evaluation both injective and surjective. Its formula is [φ]([c]φ(c)), and its naturality in X is exactly the chain-map naturality in [F2]. The auxiliary bases used to prove Ext vanishing do not occur in this map. Arbitrary functionals are admitted: step 1.2 uses finite expansions of individual vectors, with no finite support requirement on the functional or finite bound on the basis.

F1F2step 1.1step 1.2
3.1

For n=0, B1=Z1=0 and the same result follows with empty bases. For empty X, both sides are zero. On a point in degree zero, evaluation identifies k with Homk(k,k) via multiplication by the value at the constant zero-simplex; the value 1 yields the identity. If Hn(X;k)=0, the isomorphism forces Hn(X;k)=0. AC is inherited in [F2] and used explicitly in both basis applications of step 1.2. No identification of an infinite-dimensional vector space with its double dual is made.

F1F2F3step 1.1step 1.2step 2.1

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

27 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources