How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Real projective space cellular homology and the pinch map
Statement
For each integer , has a CW structure with one cell in each dimension . Orientations can be chosen so its integral cellular complex has in these degrees, for positive even , and for odd . Consequently its integral homology is in degree zero, in odd degrees , in degree when is odd, and zero otherwise. For only the degree-zero copy occurs.
The quotient induces an isomorphism . Assuming AC, it therefore induces an isomorphism , both groups being .
Facts & Assumptions
Cellular boundary is the incidence degree matrix computes boundary coefficients by the attaching map followed by collapse to the previous cell sphere; oriented edges have endpoint difference. Cellular homology computes singular homology identifies cellular and singular homology, naturally for cellular maps.
Degree of identity constant reflection and antipodal sphere maps gives antipodal degree on , . Local sphere orientations and finite puncture excision identifies local orientation generators as restrictions of global ones, and Global sphere degree is the sum of local degrees sums the contributions of a finite fibre.
Cellular maps induce cellular chain maps defines the chain maps from the actual relative skeletal maps for any abelian coefficient group, compatible with singular homology.
Under The Axiom of Choice, Cohomology over a field is dual to homology over that field identifies cohomology naturally with the full field dual of homology.
Proof
Given: The finite integer and the quotient definition in the statement. AC is used only for the final application of [F4].
Regard as the unit sphere in and let its last-coordinate upper hemisphere be . In the antipodal quotient, each class outside the equatorial has a unique representative in its open upper hemisphere. The equator maps to by its antipodal quotient. Hence adjoining this closed hemisphere to attaches one -disk by that equatorial quotient map. This is a homeomorphism of the attachment quotient with : it is a continuous bijection from a compact space to a Hausdorff space. To check Hausdorffness here, two distinct antipodal orbits are finite disjoint subsets of the metric sphere, so sufficiently small disjoint neighborhoods of the two orbits may be chosen invariant under the antipodal map; their quotient images are disjoint open neighborhoods. Starting with and iterating these finite disk attachments gives the stated CW structure and the usual inclusions as skeleta.
For , the cellular incidence map is : quotient by antipodes and then collapse the lower skeleton. The preimage of the lower skeleton is the equatorial . Off that equator, each of the two open hemispheres maps homeomorphically onto the open top cell in the target. Choose a point there, with preimages , and orient the characteristic -disk so the local degree at is . Let be the antipodal map of the domain. Since , composition of the induced maps of local relative groups gives . The local degree of the homeomorphism equals its global degree: the global-to-local generator maps commute with and are isomorphisms by [F2]. Thus and . The finite-fibre formula yields . With the preceding cell orientation fixed, the source cell can be oriented as above in each degree. By [F1], is therefore for even and zero for odd . For , both endpoints attach to the sole vertex, so directly, without a degree assertion for .
For even, is injective, so . For odd, and , so . In top degree , there is no incoming boundary: the kernel is for odd and zero for even . In degree zero gives . There are no chains above or below zero. [F1] transfers these cellular computations to integral singular homology. This also proves separately that is just the point case and has .
With coefficients , each cellular group is and every differential is zero. Indeed change of coefficients in the relative chain groups sends each oriented integral disk generator to the coefficient-one disk generator, and commutes with the defining connecting and quotient maps; hence the coefficients computed in step 2.1 reduce modulo two. These coefficient-one generators span each one-cell group, so this identifies its entire differential. For the resulting complex has one copy of in degrees zero, one and two and zero differentials, in particular .
Collapse in the disk attachment for . This collapses the boundary of its characteristic -disk and leaves its interior unchanged, so the quotient is with one zero-cell and one two-cell. The map is cellular. Its map on degree-two cellular groups sends the characteristic disk generator to the same disk generator, since the composite characteristic disk map is the quotient used to define that target generator. Over this is the identity, while the target degree-one group is zero. Both degree-two homology groups are their entire degree-two chain groups, so the cellular map induces an isomorphism. By [F3], this is the actual singular map .
Apply the natural field-duality isomorphism [F4] in degree two. Its naturality square identifies with precomposition by the isomorphism of step 4.1. Precomposition by an isomorphism has inverse precomposition by its inverse, so is an isomorphism as claimed. This uses singular cohomology throughout, with no assumption that a cellular cochain is a singular cochain.
The homology formula excludes negative degrees and handles the top degree separately, so it does not count the degree-zero group twice when . For it gives , integrally, while step 3.2 gives nonzero mod-two ; these are distinct coefficient assertions. Orienting the finitely many cells in a fixed makes only finite choices; the displayed local degrees are unchanged up to the controlled cell-orientation sign. The AC assumption in step 5.1 is inherited from field duality and is not used to prove the cellular boundary or integral homology calculation.
Depends on
- Cellular boundary is the incidence degree matrix
- Cellular homology computes singular homology
- Cellular maps induce cellular chain maps
- Degree of identity constant reflection and antipodal sphere maps
- Global sphere degree is the sum of local degrees
- Local sphere orientations and finite puncture excision
- Cohomology over a field is dual to homology over that field
- The Axiom of Choice
Used by
- A nonorientable closed manifold has no integral fundamental class Counterexample
- The integral Kronecker map need not be an isomorphism Counterexample
- The UCT splitting is not natural Counterexample
- Integral cohomology of real projective space from UCT Example
- Mod-two cohomology ring of real projective space Example
- Mod-two duality for real projective space Example
- Tor term in the homology of a product of real projective spaces Example
Dependency tree · two levels
30 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Miller, section 17, printed pages 42–44; pinch map checked locally (standard reference, not scraped)