Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-09-07 rests on unproved material (inherited)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Rests on 3 statements not proved in this library, by way of the results it cites. This item cites no such statement directly; it depends on results that do. The unproved premises it inherits are Cohen's first model: an infinite Dedekind-finite set of reals, Sierpiński 1947: the generalised continuum hypothesis implies the Axiom of Choice and The continuum hypothesis and its generalisation are independent of ZFC. Each is recorded with a citation to the literature and is not established here, because the track that would prove it has not yet been developed in this library. Everything else in this proof is proved here.

Cellular boundary is the incidence degree matrix

Statement

Let X be a CW complex. For n1, in the integral cellular chain groups with the chosen cell orientations, dneαn=β[eαn:eβn1]eβn1.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A CW complex X, integral cellular chains, and the chosen cell orientations; the differential is as in Cellular boundary from three consecutive skeleta.

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Project the three-skeleton connecting map defining dn to the summand of a fixed (n1)-cell.

given
2.1

For n2, first pass from Xn1 to Xn1/Xn2 as required by the relative target of the cellular boundary, and then collapse all summand spheres except that of eβn1. Equivalently, collapse the entire complement Xn1eβn1, including Xn2. Naturality of the connecting homomorphism for the characteristic disk identifies the coefficient with the composite from its oriented boundary sphere to this quotient sphere. This is precisely the reduced-homology endomorphism in Incidence number of two CW cells, so its degree is [eαn:eβn1].

step 1.1
3.1

For n=1, the connecting homomorphism sends an oriented characteristic interval to its terminal endpoint minus its initial endpoint, which is exactly the separately defined incidence number. The boundary is an element of a direct sum, so only finitely many coefficients are nonzero; equality of all its projections therefore proves the formula for every n1; separately, d0=0 by definition.

step 1.1step 2.1

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

6 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources