How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Cellular homology of a lens space
Example
For , the standard cellular complex is . Hence , , and .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The standard one-cell-in-each-dimension CW structure of , .
Verification
Its incidence degrees are in dimensions , respectively, so the displayed complex follows from Cellular boundary is the incidence degree matrix.
Its kernels and images are the stated groups (also for , when ), and the cellular comparison transfers them to singular homology.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
10 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Allen Hatcher, Algebraic Topology, Example 2.43 (standard reference, not scraped)