How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Field cohomology of an infinite wedge of circles
Example
Assume AC. Let have the CW weak topology, with all circle vertices identified. For every field , whereas . The cohomology group is the full product, not a finite-support subgroup. For the product and direct sum are not even isomorphic as sets.
Facts & Assumptions
Cellular boundary is the incidence degree matrix gives endpoint differences for oriented edges. Cellular homology computes singular homology applies to arbitrary CW complexes and every coefficient group, using direct-sum cellular chain groups.
Under The Axiom of Choice, Cohomology over a field is dual to homology over that field identifies cohomology with the unrestricted linear dual of homology.
Proof
Given: The indicated CW wedge and a field , assuming AC.
This CW structure has one zero-cell , one oriented one-cell for each , and no higher cells. Every edge has terminal and initial endpoint , so its cellular boundary is by [F1]. With coefficients in the same endpoint calculation gives , and zero differential. Thus its homology is in degree zero, the displayed direct sum in degree one, and zero in higher degrees. The arbitrary-CW comparison of [F1] transfers these actual groups to singular homology. The prescribed weak topology is essential to that CW application.
For each sequence , define . Every input sum has finite support, so this is a well-defined linear functional with no restriction on the support of . Conversely a linear functional is determined by the sequence ; linearity gives . These maps are inverse and linear. Applying [F2] and step 1.1 yields the claimed product. The dual of is by evaluation at , and the dual of zero is zero, giving the degree-zero and higher-degree cohomology groups.
For , a finite-support sequence maps injectively to the nonnegative integer by uniqueness of binary expansion, and every such integer comes from its finite binary expansion. Thus the direct sum is countable. The full product cannot be enumerated as : the sequence differs from the th proposed sequence at coordinate . It is therefore uncountable and cannot be isomorphic to the direct sum. The all-one sequence also explicitly represents a functional outside the canonical finite-support subgroup: it sends every to .
The zero sequence corresponds to the zero functional; a sequence supported at one coordinate is evaluation of that coordinate. The single vertex gives even though there are infinitely many edges. There is no degree-two cell, so no unmentioned differential changes the degree-one direct sum. The diagonal argument in step 3.1 uses the explicitly given enumeration indices and requires no choices; AC is inherited from field duality in [F2] and is also available for the arbitrary-CW comparison's compactness argument. This is the CW wedge, whose topology is not being replaced by a shrinking-circle subspace topology.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
17 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Hatcher, singular cohomology and unrestricted cochains, printed pages197–202; explicit CW and dual calculation (standard reference, not scraped)