Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedaudited 2026-09-12
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Cohomology of lens spaces from UCT

Example

Assume AC. For integers p1 and q with gcd(p,q)=1, use the convention L(p,q)=S3/ρ,ρ(z1,z2)=(ζz1,ζqz2),ζ=e2πi/p. Its integral cohomology is H0=H3=Z, H2=Z/p, H1=0, and zero in all other degrees. In particular p=1 gives S3 and Z/1=0.

Facts & Assumptions

[F1]

Cellular boundary is the incidence degree matrix computes cellular boundary from incidence degree and endpoint difference; The cellular boundary squares to zero gives d2=0.

[F2]

Cellular homology computes singular homology and Cellular maps induce cellular chain maps transfer cellular calculations and actual cellular maps to singular homology.

[F3]

Topological universal coefficient short exact sequence for cohomology gives UCT under The Axiom of Choice. The explicit cyclic Hom/Ext computations in Integral cohomology detects adjacent homology torsion give Ext1(Z/p,Z)=Z/p, with zero Ext for free groups.

[F4]

Homology of spheres gives the homology of S3 for the separate case p=1.

Proof

Given: p,q as stated. For steps 1.1 through 4.1 assume p>1. Write θ=2π/p.

1.1

The cyclic action is free: if ρk fixes a point and z10, then p divides k; if z1=0, then z20 and p divides kq, hence k since gcd(p,q)=1. The circle A={(z1,0):z1=1} is invariant and its quotient is a circle, explicitly by z1z1p. Give it one vertex and one oriented edge. Choose an integer r with rq1(modp); it can be the least such integer in 0,,p1, so no selection principle is needed. The generator ρr moves the argument of nonzero z2 by θ modulo 2π.

given
2.1

A fundamental closed sector is the set of (w,1w2eit) with w1 and 0tθ. At w=1, all values of t represent the same point of A. Thus the sector is (D2×[0,θ])/, collapsing each vertical interval over D2. The map sending its class to (Rew,Imw,(2t/θ1)1w2) is a continuous bijection onto the unit 3-ball. It is a homeomorphism by compactness and Hausdorffness. Its boundary consists of the two disk faces t=0,θ, meeting in the rim A. In the orbit quotient, these faces are identified by ρr, and the rim is identified by the cyclic rotation on A. Every orbit outside the rim has a unique representative in the open sector, except that its two endpoint face representatives are identified. The quotient consequently attaches one open 2-cell (the identified face interiors) and one open 3-cell (the sector interior) to A/ρ. These characteristic maps give the quotient topology: all spaces are finite compact quotients, and the orbit space is Hausdorff since finite disjoint orbits have disjoint invariant neighborhoods. This proves the claimed one-cell-per-degree CW structure in degrees zero through three.

step 1.1
3.1

The attaching boundary of the face t=0 is its rim w=1, which maps to the quotient circle by wwp. This map has degree p, as can be checked without a winding-number assumption: subdivide its domain circle at the pth roots of unity, with oriented arcs aj in increasing angle. Each boundary is vj+1vj, so the cellular H1 generator is jaj. In the target one-edge circle, the power map sends each arc to that edge with coefficient +1, since its angular parameter t2π(j+t)/p maps to t2πt with the same orientation. Thus its cellular homology map multiplies by p, and [F2] identifies this as its singular degree. By [F1], orienting the face accordingly gives d2=p. Also d1=0 because the single edge has the same initial and terminal vertex.

F1F2step 1.1step 2.1
4.1

Since d2 is multiplication by the nonzero integer p, it is injective. The identity d2d3=0 in [F1] forces d3=0. The entire integral cellular complex is therefore Z0ZpZ0Z in degrees three down to zero. Its homology is H0=H3=Z, H1=Z/p and H2=0, with no groups outside those degrees. This is the singular homology by [F2].

F1F2step 2.1step 3.1
5.1

Apply [F3]. In degree zero evaluation gives H0=Z. In degree one both Ext1(H0,Z) and Hom(H1,Z) vanish, so H1=0. In degree two the Hom term is zero and the Ext term is Z/p, giving H2=Z/p. In degree three the Ext term is zero and the Hom term is Z, giving H3=Z. In degree four the only possible lower input is free H3, whose Ext is zero; in all higher degrees both inputs vanish. Negative degrees are zero by the cochain convention.

F3step 4.1
6.1

For p=1 the group action is trivial and the space is S3. Its free homology in degrees zero and three from [F4] gives, by the same UCT calculation, precisely the displayed answer with Z/1=0. This case does not use a sector of angle 2π as an embedded ball. Negative or large q cause no change: the action and the residue r use only its class modulo p, and coprimality is exactly what step 1.1 needs. AC is inherited from [F3]; the finite quotient construction, the integer residue and the boundary calculations require none. The computation concerns additive cohomology and makes no claim that these groups determine the lens space up to homeomorphism.

F3F4step 1.1step 5.1

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

30 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources