How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Cohomology of lens spaces from UCT
Example
Assume AC. For integers and with , use the convention Its integral cohomology is , , , and zero in all other degrees. In particular gives and .
Facts & Assumptions
Cellular boundary is the incidence degree matrix computes cellular boundary from incidence degree and endpoint difference; The cellular boundary squares to zero gives .
Cellular homology computes singular homology and Cellular maps induce cellular chain maps transfer cellular calculations and actual cellular maps to singular homology.
Topological universal coefficient short exact sequence for cohomology gives UCT under The Axiom of Choice. The explicit cyclic Hom/Ext computations in Integral cohomology detects adjacent homology torsion give , with zero Ext for free groups.
Homology of spheres gives the homology of for the separate case .
Proof
Given: as stated. For steps 1.1 through 4.1 assume . Write .
The cyclic action is free: if fixes a point and , then divides ; if , then and divides , hence since . The circle is invariant and its quotient is a circle, explicitly by . Give it one vertex and one oriented edge. Choose an integer with ; it can be the least such integer in , so no selection principle is needed. The generator moves the argument of nonzero by modulo .
A fundamental closed sector is the set of with and . At , all values of represent the same point of . Thus the sector is , collapsing each vertical interval over . The map sending its class to is a continuous bijection onto the unit -ball. It is a homeomorphism by compactness and Hausdorffness. Its boundary consists of the two disk faces , meeting in the rim . In the orbit quotient, these faces are identified by , and the rim is identified by the cyclic rotation on . Every orbit outside the rim has a unique representative in the open sector, except that its two endpoint face representatives are identified. The quotient consequently attaches one open -cell (the identified face interiors) and one open -cell (the sector interior) to . These characteristic maps give the quotient topology: all spaces are finite compact quotients, and the orbit space is Hausdorff since finite disjoint orbits have disjoint invariant neighborhoods. This proves the claimed one-cell-per-degree CW structure in degrees zero through three.
The attaching boundary of the face is its rim , which maps to the quotient circle by . This map has degree , as can be checked without a winding-number assumption: subdivide its domain circle at the th roots of unity, with oriented arcs in increasing angle. Each boundary is , so the cellular generator is . In the target one-edge circle, the power map sends each arc to that edge with coefficient , since its angular parameter maps to with the same orientation. Thus its cellular homology map multiplies by , and [F2] identifies this as its singular degree. By [F1], orienting the face accordingly gives . Also because the single edge has the same initial and terminal vertex.
Since is multiplication by the nonzero integer , it is injective. The identity in [F1] forces . The entire integral cellular complex is therefore in degrees three down to zero. Its homology is , and , with no groups outside those degrees. This is the singular homology by [F2].
Apply [F3]. In degree zero evaluation gives . In degree one both and vanish, so . In degree two the Hom term is zero and the Ext term is , giving . In degree three the Ext term is zero and the Hom term is , giving . In degree four the only possible lower input is free , whose Ext is zero; in all higher degrees both inputs vanish. Negative degrees are zero by the cochain convention.
For the group action is trivial and the space is . Its free homology in degrees zero and three from [F4] gives, by the same UCT calculation, precisely the displayed answer with . This case does not use a sector of angle as an embedded ball. Negative or large cause no change: the action and the residue use only its class modulo , and coprimality is exactly what step 1.1 needs. AC is inherited from [F3]; the finite quotient construction, the integer residue and the boundary calculations require none. The computation concerns additive cohomology and makes no claim that these groups determine the lens space up to homeomorphism.
Depends on
- Topological universal coefficient short exact sequence for cohomology
- The Axiom of Choice
- Cellular boundary is the incidence degree matrix
- Cellular homology computes singular homology
- Cellular maps induce cellular chain maps
- The cellular boundary squares to zero
- Homology of spheres
- Integral cohomology detects adjacent homology torsion
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
30 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Hatcher, Example 2.43, complete finite lens-space construction and boundaries, printed pages144–146 (standard reference, not scraped)