How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Topological universal coefficient short exact sequence for cohomology
Statement
Assume AC. For every space , abelian group and there is a natural short exact sequence The same assertion holds with in every homology and cohomology term for any subspace . Here and Ext is computed from projective resolutions of the first variable, with the comparison identifications proved in the local extension lemma. The map is evaluation. Naturality is contravariant in continuous maps of spaces or pairs and covariant in coefficient homomorphisms.
Facts & Assumptions
Singular UCT extension from cycle projections proves the natural exact evaluation sequence for nonnegative free PID complexes, including comparison independence and degree zero, under AC as in The Axiom of Choice.
Singular cochain complex with coefficients identifies cochains with Hom on integral singular chains, free on the singular simplex set. Singular cohomology with coefficients takes their cohomology.
Relative singular cochain complex gives Hom on the relative quotient complex and its complementary simplex basis.
Singular chains and singular homology are covariantly functorial gives the induced chain map; The kronecker pairing is independent of cocycle and cycle representatives gives the descended evaluation and its naturality.
Proof
Given: as stated, and AC.
The absolute integral singular complex is nonnegative and free in every degree by [F2]. The ring is a PID. Applying [F1] gives the displayed short exact sequence, with its middle group identified as by [F2]. On a cycle , the right map sends to , so it is precisely the Kronecker evaluation of [F4].
For the pair, the relative chain group is freely generated by those singular simplices of whose image is not contained in : discard the coefficients on simplices in from a finite chain. Equality of the resulting complementary coefficients is exactly equality modulo chains in . This basis identification is degreewise; its differential is the induced quotient differential, which need not preserve zero extensions. Thus [F3] supplies a nonnegative free complex whose Hom cohomology is . Apply [F1] to it. Evaluation on relative cycles descends by the same calculation in [F1], so no absolute cycle lift is required.
A continuous pair map sends a simplex in to a simplex in , so the absolute chain map of [F4] descends to relative quotients and still commutes with boundaries. Its Hom pullback is exactly relative cochain precomposition. Hence chain naturality in [F1] proves the commuting short-exact-sequence diagram for pairs, as well as for absolute maps. Coefficient postcomposition is the coefficient map in both Hom complexes and in the displayed Ext cokernels, so coefficient naturality in [F1] gives the second type of commuting diagram. These assertions concern canonical evaluation and extension maps, independent of projections used to prove surjectivity.
At , the left Ext group is zero by [F1] and evaluation is an isomorphism. For , step 1.2 reproduces step 1.1; for , all relative chain groups and all terms of the sequence are zero. Empty and are included. On a point, the degree-zero evaluation sends a cochain value to the homomorphism . AC is inherited from [F1] for arbitrary-rank cycle/boundary freeness and projections, while the complementary simplex basis and the naturality maps require no additional choices. This proves every assertion.
Depends on
- Singular cohomology with coefficients
- The kronecker pairing is independent of cocycle and cycle representatives
- Singular UCT extension from cycle projections
- The Axiom of Choice
- Singular cochain complex with coefficients
- Relative singular cochain complex
- Singular chains and singular homology are covariantly functorial
Used by
- Integral cohomology detects adjacent homology torsion Corollary
- Poincaré duality gives a nonsingular cup pairing Corollary
- The integral Kronecker map need not be an isomorphism Counterexample
- The UCT splitting is not natural Counterexample
- Cohomology of lens spaces from UCT Example
- Equal additive cohomology but different rings Example
- Fundamental classes and duality for spheres and tori Example
- Integral cohomology of real projective space from UCT Example
- Integral cohomology ring of a closed orientable surface Example
- Integral cohomology ring of a torus Example
- Integral cohomology ring of complex projective space Example
- Kronecker pairing for a cellular circle generator Example
- Cap duality on a Euclidean coordinate ball Lemma
- Integral surface cup pairing from the oriented polygon Lemma
- Local coordinate cup products generate top relative cohomology Lemma
- The cohomology universal coefficient sequence splits nonnaturally Proposition
Dependency tree · two levels
22 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Miller, Theorem 27.1 and proof, printed pages 73–74 (standard reference, not scraped)