How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The kronecker pairing is independent of cocycle and cycle representatives
Statement
The Kronecker rule is independent of both cocycle and cycle representatives and is additive in both variables. For a continuous , and , it satisfies For a coefficient homomorphism , it satisfies . The same representative-independence argument gives the -bilinear pairing for -linear cochains on chains over a commutative ring .
Facts & Assumptions
Kronecker evaluation pairing specifies evaluation on cocycle/cycle representatives.
Singular cochain complex with coefficients gives , and Singular cohomology with coefficients identifies changes of cocycle representative as coboundaries. The singular chain complex and singular homology identifies changes of cycle representative as boundaries.
Singular cohomology is contravariantly functorial gives and coefficient postcomposition; Singular chains and singular homology are covariantly functorial gives .
Proof
Given: A cocycle and cycle of degree , with the spaces, maps and coefficients needed in each assertion.
Replacing by changes its value on by . Replacing by changes its value under by . The replacement cocycle is still closed and the replacement cycle still a cycle by their defining quotient subgroups. Applying the two equalities successively therefore allows both representatives to change at once. This proves descent through both quotients.
On representatives and . Zero and negatives obey the same evaluation rules. In the ring version, and by -linearity; the two vanishing calculations of step 1.1 use the same positive differential and remain valid for -linear maps.
For representatives of , the left spatial pairing is , exactly the right pairing by [F3]. Its representatives are valid cycles and cocycles because the induced maps preserve them. Likewise proves coefficient naturality. Step 1.1 makes these representative identities identities on quotient classes.
Step 1.1 proves representative independence, step 2.1 descends to biadditivity and the stated -bilinearity, and step 2.2 proves naturality. In degree zero there are no negative cochains to change the cocycle, but changing a zero-cycle by a one-boundary is still covered by the second calculation. Negative-degree groups and empty-space or zero-coefficient groups pair to zero. On a point, the degree-zero chain evaluates to , including and ; no generators in higher unnormalized chain degrees are discarded. The proof compares arbitrary representatives without choosing a representative function, so it uses no AC.
Depends on
Used by
- Kronecker pairing for a cellular circle generator Example
- Topological universal coefficient short exact sequence for cohomology Theorem
Cited to discharge well-definedness by Kronecker evaluation pairing.
Dependency tree · two levels
15 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Hatcher, section 3.1, evaluation and its naturality, printed pages 191 and 198–201 (standard reference, not scraped)